Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
While I have problems understanding this myself, I´d like to point out that pretty much every form of punishment involves this paradox: Inflicting harm on someone which - were it not for punishment - would be considered a criminal offense (e.g. incarcarating someone, taking their money against there will).I never understand how you can say to one person "You have done wrong by killing, so to show you that it was wrong - we're going to kill you..."
Has everyone gone completely mental?
Might be better odds with the death sentence. At least they get a retrial. No retrial for life in prison. So what it comes down to, are your odds better in a retrial or rotting in prison for a few decades? Personally, retrial sounds more appealing.Yes, there is a chance of dying in jail. Compare that to being executed. What are your odds of survival then?
If I accept what you say then all executions conducted in countries such as Iran, Afghanistan, China, etc. etc. which are legal are not murders? Hitler had hundreds of thousands of people executed LEGALLY and you have the Gall not to consider them murders?Can you please use the word killing? Is that so hard? When execution is abolished, then you can call it murder. Until then it is perfectally legal killing, or homicide, or life-taking... It is not murder which is a legal term.
It refers to the unlawful killing of another human being without justification or excuse.
I understand you feel stongly about this, I respect that. People are dying, and it should be unacceptable. I wish the world was perfect, and that morality was simple... However linguistics is simple, and you are doing it wrong.
You are making absolutely no sense! Does anyone know what he is talking about?????The fact that your country (Greece) is a country with a language, heritage and somewhat of a culture is through murder and mass murder. Fact. This fact applies to all presently existing territories with national borders, even the ones which received their territories from larger powers without violence.
But you on the other hand are telling me you want to live in a tribe and hunt for food while at a high risk of being attacked and killed by other tribes? Now that sounds absolutely 'progressive'!
Why are we bringing nationality into this?Kostya said:The fact that your country (Greece) is a country with a language, heritage and somewhat of a culture is through murder and mass murder. Fact.
Being legal does not make something moral - the law at best is a reflection of what we already believe to be right or wrong. After all, it was once legal to own a slave and to rape your wife (although oddly it was illegal to rape a slave).Tuddrussell said:Execution is KILLING, murder is necessarily illegal. If it is legal, it CANNOT be murder!
Sorry but execution is murder albeit a legal one.
Legality does not negate murder! If you are going to use semantics to justify murder then go ahead, but the purposeful killing of a human legally or otherwise is still MURDER!Execution is a legal killing, but you are dropping context. Killings (legal or illegal) are not some intrinsic evil. If that were true, a needful killing in self-defense would be immoral as well. Context matters!
Execution isn't necessarily the same thing as other killings morally. If you disagree, you can't just shout "murder" as if that's an argument. You are going to have to show precisely how a lawfully arrived at sentence of execution is immoral. The fact that it is a killing isn't sufficient to the task.
eudaimonia,
Mark
You are conflating two different standards. There is murder by legal standards, which is a matter of law. And there is murder by moral standards, which vary from person to person.Legality does not negate murder! If you are going to use semantics to justify murder then go ahead, but the purposeful killing of a human legally or otherwise is still MURDER!
You can candy wrap capital punishment any way you like; It does not change the fact that a country that condones and applies legal murder is a society in want of civilisation. The below are not "Murder" because they were conducted LEGALLY!
[shocking pictures] ... [/shocking pictures]
Seen enough?
I'm sure this topic has been talked to death already. Oh well.
Recently there has been talk in the UK about bringing back the death penalty. What's your stance?
A few questions to mull over:
Is capital punishment an effective deterrent?
Is it Christian to support the death penalty?
Does the method of execution matter?
Unless there is a drawback to exposing everyone to brutality. Nah! Watching brutality is good for you. Whereas, watching sex ...Fair trade. You have to spend money to make money. Just make the death rowers kill themselves. Wouldn't take much convincing, and we could have gadiatorial matches.
Generate a lot of revenue, and clear up the prisons. No more executions, no one sullies their hands with blood, and the murderers get good and dead. Everyone wins!
If you are going to use semantics to justify murder then go ahead, but the purposeful killing of a human legally or otherwise is still MURDER!
You can candy wrap capital punishment any way you like
It does not change the fact that a country that condones and applies legal murder is a society in want of civilisation.
The below are not "Murder" because they were conducted LEGALLY!
Self defence when your life is directly at risk is killing but premeditated legal executions are MURDER!
Who has the authority to judge who lives and who dies? If there is one then who gave him that authority?You live in the birthplace of Western philosophy. Back that claim up with a philosophical argument. Don't just show that "premeditated legal executions" are in some way like murder. Show that they are either ethically wrong or unjust.
eudaimonia,
Mark
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?