Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Do it without magic.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Styx87" data-source="post: 67131246" data-attributes="member: 315521"><p>No, It wasn't really. But science tests itself by taking into account multiple theories which can agree with each other. Like in biology. Biology is made up of a multitude of theories which when taken together cross confirm and support each other which lend credence to each individual theory. </p><p></p><p>And while it is true that newtonian physics, relativity and quantum physics don't really mesh with each other, that doesn't make them any less valid individually. Science tests itself by correcting it's mistakes like throwing out theories we know don't work (like phlogiston theory and aether theory are just a couple examples). Peer review and disclosure are another couple of ways science tests itself. If the tests are done over and over and continue to produce different results, the results of no single session may be used as evidence. If the peers find the scientists to be biased then the research can't be used as evidence. Science is constantly in a stated of making sure the findings are valid.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Styx87, post: 67131246, member: 315521"] No, It wasn't really. But science tests itself by taking into account multiple theories which can agree with each other. Like in biology. Biology is made up of a multitude of theories which when taken together cross confirm and support each other which lend credence to each individual theory. And while it is true that newtonian physics, relativity and quantum physics don't really mesh with each other, that doesn't make them any less valid individually. Science tests itself by correcting it's mistakes like throwing out theories we know don't work (like phlogiston theory and aether theory are just a couple examples). Peer review and disclosure are another couple of ways science tests itself. If the tests are done over and over and continue to produce different results, the results of no single session may be used as evidence. If the peers find the scientists to be biased then the research can't be used as evidence. Science is constantly in a stated of making sure the findings are valid. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Do it without magic.
Top
Bottom