Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Do evolutionists silence the critics?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="notto" data-source="post: 525887" data-attributes="member: 2918"><p>It's hard to ignore data and theories that have not submitted themselves to the peer review and publishing process.</p><p></p><p>Can you give one example where peer reviewed data has been submitted and ignored or mocked?</p><p></p><p>It is childish to suggest that science does not need to hold to a standard of repeatable, testable data in its observations. It is childish to say that "we are being ignored and mocked" when creation scientists won't even play the game but instead go to the courtroom and the voters to try to get their theories into the classroom. Shouldn't they have to play by the same rules as all the rest of the science that is there?</p><p></p><p>We can't treat unsubstantiated claims as science. If we do, science has no value.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="notto, post: 525887, member: 2918"] It's hard to ignore data and theories that have not submitted themselves to the peer review and publishing process. Can you give one example where peer reviewed data has been submitted and ignored or mocked? It is childish to suggest that science does not need to hold to a standard of repeatable, testable data in its observations. It is childish to say that "we are being ignored and mocked" when creation scientists won't even play the game but instead go to the courtroom and the voters to try to get their theories into the classroom. Shouldn't they have to play by the same rules as all the rest of the science that is there? We can't treat unsubstantiated claims as science. If we do, science has no value. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Do evolutionists silence the critics?
Top
Bottom