Do archeologists know where this is?

PFJ said:

The ark is by no means a new story, it is simply a rehash of several other stories that preceeded it, most notably the epic of gilgamesh. Modern "theological historians", as they like to call themselves, are claiming that the ark is real and yet any individual who is disciplined in the study of history will recognise that claim as false. There is no evidence to back up that claim, and they are not qualifying their ideas either, meaning any claims they make must be disregarded because they are an absolute bias without substantial proof. The ark will never be found because it simply never existed. IF proof can be found and a consensus of NON-theistic Historians (As they would be the least bias and the most ready to accept historical revelations) agreed that it was proof of the ark, then I would change my tune. It will never happend though, common sense says no.

Click to expand...

Biblewriter said:

The identification of Gog with Russia is not speculation. Gog is "of the land of Magog. and "The prince of Rosh, Meshech, and Tubal." We have ancient documents which clearly identify Magog with the words "whom the Greeks call Scythians." The Rosh (also called the Ros) were a well known tribe living from the Black Sea to the Baltic Sea. The oldest known reference to that name (ca 350 AD) identified it as Gog. Meshech and Tubal were two ancient tribes that lived in the region between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea, but when the Turks invaded in 1050 AD, they fled north. Their names are believed to be the sources of the modern names Moscow and Tobolsk, but whether of not that is correct, they definitely fled to regions within the area we now call Russia.

Click to expand...