Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
DNA preserves the integrity of its program
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pshun2404" data-source="post: 71778045" data-attributes="member: 301030"><p>First of all “<strong><em>Why should evidence-free ancient tales get a pass?</em></strong>” Ancient assessments must be teamed up with understandings capable at the time but I agree 100% they should not simply get a pass.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong><em>Derail it? YOU brought up bats!</em></strong></p><p></p><p>Yes derail it. You somehow were trying to make it about God and the Bible. Bats are one example of the some creatures that simply appear fully formed with no semi-bat or quasi-bat forerunners. There are many others. HOW they came to be (millions of years ago) can only be guessed at not known). Your preconceived GUESS is no better than any other.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong><em>It tries, but changes accumulate. Surely you have read the big genome papers which outlined the extent of the duplications and transpositions and such that have shaped our genome?</em></strong></p><p></p><p>Yes indeed some do accumulate and this adds to variation in the organisms and to disease.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><em>And if so, does this support or negate the story attached that says one earlier creature becomes the other over time?</em></p><p></p><p><strong><em>Supports it.</em></strong></p><p></p><p>That is your opinion which I respect, but no such transformations have been validated after 150 years of research so I will agree to disagree.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pshun2404, post: 71778045, member: 301030"] First of all “[B][I]Why should evidence-free ancient tales get a pass?[/I][/B]” Ancient assessments must be teamed up with understandings capable at the time but I agree 100% they should not simply get a pass. [B][I]Derail it? YOU brought up bats![/I][/B] Yes derail it. You somehow were trying to make it about God and the Bible. Bats are one example of the some creatures that simply appear fully formed with no semi-bat or quasi-bat forerunners. There are many others. HOW they came to be (millions of years ago) can only be guessed at not known). Your preconceived GUESS is no better than any other. [B][I]It tries, but changes accumulate. Surely you have read the big genome papers which outlined the extent of the duplications and transpositions and such that have shaped our genome?[/I][/B] Yes indeed some do accumulate and this adds to variation in the organisms and to disease. [I]And if so, does this support or negate the story attached that says one earlier creature becomes the other over time?[/I] [B][I]Supports it.[/I][/B] That is your opinion which I respect, but no such transformations have been validated after 150 years of research so I will agree to disagree. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
DNA preserves the integrity of its program
Top
Bottom