Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
DNA preserves the integrity of its program
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pshun2404" data-source="post: 71767171" data-attributes="member: 301030"><p>I liked the second more general article but as for the first if <em>I (</em>or any other) were to use this type of article in support of a contrary view, we would be ridiculed because the references used to support the view were all from the 40s and 50s (we would be slammed with the "way to old" default myth) but I still got good information from this article and appreciated the earlier work so thanks...</p><p></p><p>I guess what sticks out is how (for extreme Darwinians and YECs) when it supports their view we are supposed to allow it, but if it questions it must be discredited (acceptance by convenience)...it is a kind of confirmation bias that clouds objectivity.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pshun2404, post: 71767171, member: 301030"] I liked the second more general article but as for the first if [I]I ([/I]or any other) were to use this type of article in support of a contrary view, we would be ridiculed because the references used to support the view were all from the 40s and 50s (we would be slammed with the "way to old" default myth) but I still got good information from this article and appreciated the earlier work so thanks... I guess what sticks out is how (for extreme Darwinians and YECs) when it supports their view we are supposed to allow it, but if it questions it must be discredited (acceptance by convenience)...it is a kind of confirmation bias that clouds objectivity. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
DNA preserves the integrity of its program
Top
Bottom