Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
DNA preserves the integrity of its program
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FrumiousBandersnatch" data-source="post: 71659299" data-attributes="member: 241055"><p>Early genomes would have been tiny, with no means to correct errors - such a genome would be very mutable and subject to very strong selection - ideal conditions for rapid evolution to produce novel proteins - eventually including simple repair enzymes. With each stabilising development, the rate of novelty production would drop, and that particular selection pressure would ease a little. So you'd expect an initial burst of extremely rapid innovation and die-off, reducing slowly until the genomes were stable enough to produce differentiated populations adapted for different niches.</p><p></p><p>Classic argument from incredulity.</p><p></p><p>Gibberish.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FrumiousBandersnatch, post: 71659299, member: 241055"] Early genomes would have been tiny, with no means to correct errors - such a genome would be very mutable and subject to very strong selection - ideal conditions for rapid evolution to produce novel proteins - eventually including simple repair enzymes. With each stabilising development, the rate of novelty production would drop, and that particular selection pressure would ease a little. So you'd expect an initial burst of extremely rapid innovation and die-off, reducing slowly until the genomes were stable enough to produce differentiated populations adapted for different niches. Classic argument from incredulity. Gibberish. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
DNA preserves the integrity of its program
Top
Bottom