TagliatelliMonster
Well-Known Member
This poster has a really bad track record when it comes to defining the terms he uses.
Ow and by the way:
Just saying...
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You need to define "blind chance" a little better--to make sure that the evolutionary process fits that description
No it's not, nature is evidence of nature making pixies that live at the bottom of every garden and in every window box in the world, everyone knows that.Nature itself is evidence of an intelligent designer. Otherwise it would not display mind. Your claim that blind chance leads to the construction of a brain is preposterous. In fact, that's more ridiculous than abiogenesis itself.
Does it mention a god, gods, or a God?Is that video evidence for all creator Gods or just the Christian creator God?
Ridicule isn't a rebuttal.No it's not, nature is evidence of nature making pixies that live at the bottom of every garden and window box in the world, everyone knows that.
What? That I should bug off?This poster has a really bad track record when it comes to defining the terms he uses.
Ow and by the way:
View attachment 188770
Just saying...
What? That I should bug off?
Ridicule isn't a rebuttal.
[bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse]!! I didn't notice that. Please, nobody give me any more ratings.No. I just required an excuse to post the funny screenshot with the funny number.
By all means, carry on!
[bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse]!! I didn't notice that. Please, nobody give me any more ratings.
Does it mention a god, gods, or a God?
But it's not ridicule, nature making pixies has as much evidence for their existence as a creator.Ridicule isn't a rebuttal.
Your analogy is seriously flawed. Inability to detect that it is seriously flawed indicates a need to become familiar with cogent reasoning essential to the scientific method.But it's not ridicule, nature making pixies has as much evidence for their existence as a creator.
No, not that kind of information. A different kind. Which I'll refuse to define. That way no matter what evidence is produced I can continue to claim that I was talking about something different.The natural process of evolution already produces information,
And the inability to understand one hasn't established how 'mygoddidit' as an hypothesis holds any more sway over purple Tuesday farting pixies did it, indicates a need to become familiar with cogent syllogisms and basic understandings of natural sciences.Your analogy is seriously flawed. Inability to detect that it is seriously flawed indicates a need to become familiar with cogent reasoning essential to the scientific method.
Nature itself is evidence of an intelligent designer. Otherwise it would not display mind.
Your claim that blind chance leads to the construction of a brain is preposterous. In fact, that's more ridiculous than abiogenesis itself.
Yes many times.Does it mention a god, gods, or a God?
Yes many times.
It's OK to fool yourself into believing something without evidence but not others.
You have your own personal, unique interpretation of the word "shown"? How very convenient!You haven't shown that it displays a mind. In fact, you argue constantly that nature is incapable of starting or evolving life.
Argument from incredulity. Are you sure you took those logic classes?
You have your own personal, unique interpretation of the word "shown"? How very convenient!
Yet another post devoid of evidence.Nahhhhh!
There is plenty of very obvious and exceedingly compelling evidence and claiming that it doesn't exist will NEVER make it go away regardless of how vehemently you and others with an aversion to an intelligent designer might claim that it doesn't. It is what it is amigo. I suggest that you simply accept it and learn to live with it instead of constantly playing the ridiculously hypocritically obvious and totally unconvincing selective blindness game.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?