Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Dissecting one of Tolkien's quotes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="~Anastasia~" data-source="post: 73042762" data-attributes="member: 343500"><p>Ah you're going out of order and our replies are crossing. </p><p></p><p>I disagree with intellectual dishonesty wherever it happens. Some of the theories and evidence presented by "creation scientists" make me cringe. I know I've said that at least once in one of your two threads. </p><p></p><p>Randy - I don't know. To be honest, I'm not following what every person says in every thread. This really isn't something I'm invested in arguing. </p><p></p><p>It just seems to me that this thread is mostly about "someone on the other side said something wrong." Yes ... that's certainly true and not hard to demonstrate. Many "creationists" would serve their cause better by not speaking. But as I'm sure you know, that demonstrates nothing beyond invalidating that particular statement. To me it seems a waste of time. </p><p></p><p>But if you like, I'll look for info on those textbooks. I'm just wondering does it really matter (to you) that it was taught at that point in time? By the reasoning of "the other side taught/sad something wrong" ... I doubt you'd be convinced if the shoe was on the other foot regarding one small fact. </p><p></p><p>I'm not trying to be antagonistic towards you. I just think there are lots of things more worthwhile to pursue.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="~Anastasia~, post: 73042762, member: 343500"] Ah you're going out of order and our replies are crossing. I disagree with intellectual dishonesty wherever it happens. Some of the theories and evidence presented by "creation scientists" make me cringe. I know I've said that at least once in one of your two threads. Randy - I don't know. To be honest, I'm not following what every person says in every thread. This really isn't something I'm invested in arguing. It just seems to me that this thread is mostly about "someone on the other side said something wrong." Yes ... that's certainly true and not hard to demonstrate. Many "creationists" would serve their cause better by not speaking. But as I'm sure you know, that demonstrates nothing beyond invalidating that particular statement. To me it seems a waste of time. But if you like, I'll look for info on those textbooks. I'm just wondering does it really matter (to you) that it was taught at that point in time? By the reasoning of "the other side taught/sad something wrong" ... I doubt you'd be convinced if the shoe was on the other foot regarding one small fact. I'm not trying to be antagonistic towards you. I just think there are lots of things more worthwhile to pursue. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Dissecting one of Tolkien's quotes
Top
Bottom