Um, how do you explain why pulsar frequencies are observed not to vary, just as we would expect if c was constant?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Um, how do you explain why pulsar frequencies are observed not to vary, just as we would expect if c was constant?It's not that they don't understand.
They're willing to set general relativity and other sciences aside, if it'll make the Bible or us look bad.
I don't.Um, how do you explain why pulsar frequencies are observed not to vary,
Make me.As I said, thanks for playing. Now go playing elsewhere.
Hey, don't do that!As I said, thanks for playing. Now go playing elsewhere.
Um, how do you explain why pulsar frequencies are observed not to vary, just as we would expect if c was constant?
Fire away!I still have unanswered questions for AV1611VET.
The Jews wrote one of many speculative creation stories among many religions in the world wherein people would die for their belief in these erroneous conclusions. The chief medicine men, the shamans and eventually the priest class create routine stories for public consumption as a way of holding the faith of the people in the purpose of their religion. Some of these men are sincere others are a fraud and use religion for personal gain.Kanned Ham and other creationists insist that the subject of deep time is not based on "observational science". This article describes how direct observations in the here and now show that the speed of light has not changed significantly over vast stretches of time and that the idea of a young earth and a young universe is false. SN1987A and the Age of the Universe
"When the smoke blown about finally drifts away and the debate hall falls silent, the young-earth creationists find themselves back on square one. He is looking at stars many millions of light-years away, stars putting out light which takes many millions of years to reach us! Attempts to speed up the velocity of light or to shrink down the universe have come to naught. What does remain is the old age of our universe."
I already asked them twice, in post nr 7 and nr 13.Fire away!
And I answered it in Post 8 ... and you know I did.I already asked them twice, in post nr 7 and nr 13.
Nope you didn't. You made me imagine you holding the sun in your hand, moving it a light year away and creating the light in between.And I answered it in Post 8 ... and you know I did.
Fair enough.So, there are still two unanswered questions.
So you fail at the very first question of what you label as "your forté"...Fair enough.
They'll stay unanswered too, until you can learn to set your myopic science aside and humor people.
You betcha I did!So you fail at the very first question of what you label as "your forté"...
Read the article linked to in the OP. I was referring to the pulse frequency. Pulsars rates are observed to decay very slowly, but we observe nothing like the change we should observe should the speed of light have varied considerably in the past. This makes us conclude that observations such as those of supernova SN1987A indicate events that are way older than Ussher's chronology.The frequency of light has nothing to do with the speed of light. The frequency of light can vary from one end of the spectrum to the other, yet light remains constant. But you didn't answer my post as to why light is constant?
So according to you since light is constant we would expect the frequency of light to remain constant, yet it varies from the ultraviolet to the infrared.......
But personally I would look to electromagnetic principles since we produce stable frequency pulses of light in the laboratory without using "strange matter" to do it. But I already answered that question, in the post right after the one you ignored.
Now if you mean the timing of the pulses, when you say frequency, then that too can be explained in any laboratory, we do it with strobe lights every day, which don't spin at the speed of dentists drill but use simple relaxation oscillators, you know, electromagnetic principles and electromagnetic waves. We do that too without "strange matter".
As a matter of fact it is easily reproduced in a plasma laboratory, and since 99.9% of the universe is plasma, I don't see why I would need "strange matter"? Unless of course I had preconceived ideas of lighthouses.....
Hey, you guys are the one that wants space to be expanding at an accelerating rate, yet light to magically cross this expanding space without taking any more time......I already asked them twice, in post nr 7 and nr 13.
But hey, since creation is your forte:
The Galactic center is at approximately 30.000 light years from the earth. Meaning that the light it emits needs to travel 30.000 years before reaching the earth. How do you explain that we can see the galactic center?
the Andromeda nebula is at 2.5 b
million light years from the earth. So the light needs to travel 2.5 million years? How do you explain that we can see the Andromeda nebula, if light travelled only 6020 years?
Why would we assume the speed of light varied on the past? But again, we produce pulsar effects in any plasma laboratory, without the need for ad hoc matter.Read the article linked to in the OP. I was referring to the pulse frequency. Pulsars rates are observed to decay very slowly, but we observe nothing like the change we should observe should the speed of light have varied considerably in the past. This makes us conclude that observations such as those of supernova SN1987A indicate events that are way older than Ussher's chronology.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?