Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
There may well have been one associated with the end of the last ice age--What people are calling the "Black Sea" flood.There is no flood in that model is there?
So the physical evidence of God's creation is a lie? I tend to believe God's creation over the muses of men who had no idea at their time about anything in their physical surroundings.Nor are naturalistic models / conjectures....
You said before the flood.Didn't say there was, I was talking about rain.
Naturalism is a lie.So the physical evidence of God's creation is a lie?
Yes, 4.5 billion years before the flood described in the Genesis account.You said before the flood.
(never mind)
Opinion noted and dismissed through my background and experience in the earth sciences.Naturalism is a lie.
It's a belief.
Well, naturalism IS a belief.Opinion noted and dismissed through my background and experience in the earth sciences.
No, its is real and you choose to ignore it. If the creation account is literally factual, then why did God create a earth full of evidence to the contrary?Well, naturalism IS a belief.
And you know it.
But the levels of strata we find show more evidence of rapid layering and rapid erosion. Along with rapid burials of plants and animals. I do agree that we are shown glimpses of the stratification process, but what we have to look at in the geologic column do not show that what we see is what created it. A global flood seems a lot more likely of a scenario to get what we have.
I think simply that there is and has been a narrative that has evidence for but is not necessarily 100% proven. There is not a missing link for any animal or human in my opinion. . . .
Premise 1 that you quote is false, so your conclusion must be false also.P1 Jesus wouldn't use the Genesis stories in His preaching unless He agreed with my interpretation of them.
P2 Jesus used the Genesis stories in His preaching.
C Jesus agreed with my interpretation of them.
See how lame that is? It would work with anybody's interpretation so it proves nothing.
What exactly are my claims about the text of the flood story that you feel Jesus would have to correct me about if He were here to talk to me about it (that's not a trick question - I just want to know where my apparent error lies)?Now you're getting confused. Are you claiming that Jesus endorses the flood as an historical event or endorses your claims about the text of the flood story?
In what respect?Premise 1 that you quote is false, so your conclusion must be false also.
What exactly are my claims about the text of the flood story that you feel Jesus would have to correct me about if He were here to talk to me about it (that's not a trick question - I just want to know where my apparent error lies)?
Scientists suggest no such thing. There were many other animals around besides dinosaurs during the Mesozoic Era.I hope this is the fullness,
Genesis 1:28
The word "replenish"
Dinosaurs were the only things around for the many millions of years which scientists suggest according to fossils, but not anything else.
Same family, but not species.Many fossils of "ancient animals" are still alive, and they thought they were extinct.
You just made that up. The bible says no such thing.The reason they died, and the reason their bones are not decayed to dust, is a flash freeze over the whole earth.
God blew on the earth and all of it froze.
That's the problem I have with creation science. If totally off-the-wall-made-up-stuff has to be presented in order to justify one's scripture interpretation, what does that suggest about the validly of the scripture?The reason all of the earth flash-froze, was because there was an unending heavy rain, which dinosaurs needed, even as an alligator would have flesh crumble away if they didn't have water on them for a day.
This is also supported in scripture as the frozen earth melted, "And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters." Genesis 1:2
So there were no rivers or lakes?This is also supported, because before the flood of Noah's Ark, those people survived for water by dew on the grass.
Are you aware that the entire moisture content in Earth's atmosphere completely overturns every 7 to 10 days?There was once water in the atmosphere rather than relatively none today, which we're used to, and this also explains where that flood had come from.
The dinosaurs were all ready on a sever decline before bolide impact.A meteor did not kill the dinosaurs, nor did it split the single landmass.
Where does the bible say that?The reason God killed the dinosaurs with a flash freeze, was because when Satan fell he caused violence on the earth, and the dinosaurs started eating each other.
Sir, I have an M.S. that includes that very area of science. Your argument breaks every single law of physics, chemistry, and mathematics, nor are any of the biblical suggestions presented supported by any biblical scripture.I conveyed hidden / unknown things,
and I used scripture where I could.
Only God could convey this, yet you think it is terribly wrong.
Assuming someone made something up, is also making something up.
Another question you should ask yourself is, why are people telling you that the theory of evolution (which has nothing to do with theories about the age of the Earth, btw) is assumed by the scientific community to be a fact? Scientific theories are ever "assumed as fact."
Sir, I have an M.S. that includes that very area of science. Your argument breaks every single law of physics, chemistry, and mathematics, nor are any of the biblical suggestions presented supported by any biblical scripture.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?