• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bungle_Bear

Whoot!
Mar 6, 2011
9,084
3,513
✟262,640.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
I don't know if it's deliberate or not, but you twist pretty much everything that anyone says and play back a parody of what has actually been posted. Like I said, strawmen are much more amusing than reality.
 
Reactions: DogmaHunter
Upvote 0

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,204
7,479
31
Wales
✟429,436.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
Depressed, .. nothing that repentance on bended knees can't fix. And you will jump and sing with joy, I promise!

No, what would fix it is if you actually take the time and be sincere and actually learn about the thing your supposed to be criticizing.
Or just stop wasting people's time and actually admit that you are all just pulling out collective legs with these insipid tirades.
 
Upvote 0

HitchSlap

PROUDLY PRIMATE
Aug 6, 2012
14,723
5,468
✟288,596.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Depressed, .. nothing that repentance on bended knees can't fix. And you will jump and sing with joy, I promise!
You know as well as I do that prayer doesn’t work. No need to tell porkies, we’re all adults here.
 
Upvote 0

Jimmy D

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2014
5,147
5,995
✟277,099.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
[/quote][/quote][/QUOTE]

 
Upvote 0

doubtingmerle

I'll think about it.
Site Supporter
Jan 28, 2003
9,969
2,521
Pennsylvania
Visit site
✟534,373.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Sure would feel sorry for that poor woman, .. I pray that an embryo never becomes an adult.
How do you plan to keep all embryos from growing into adults?

Abortions?
 
Upvote 0

Arius

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 31, 2017
681
201
Phoenix
✟149,280.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Marital Status
Married
I don't know if it's deliberate or not, but you twist pretty much everything that anyone says and play back a parody of what has actually been posted. Like I said, strawmen are much more amusing than reality.

@Warden_of_the_Storm , @HitchSlap , @Jimmy D @doubtingmerle

OK, before you guys have me kicked off this Forum, .. again:
Do you, or do you not believe in the Evolution theory, where this so called theory claims that we humans evolved from amoeba, then a population of amoeba over the span of billions of years transitioned on to gorillas, and from gorillas a a population of gorillas evolved and transitioned into humans!?

Transition:
Definition of transition. 1 a : passage from one state, stage, subject, or place to another : change. b : a movement, development, or evolution from one form, stage, or style to another.

as in "transitioning fossils"

evolve:
1. develop gradually, especially from a simple to a more complex form.
"the company has evolved into a major chemical manufacturer"
synonyms: develop, progress, advance


as in "a population of gorillas, over millions of years evolved into a population of humans" (I have posted evidence what Evolutionists considered these "population of humans" to be)

If so, then PLEASE, can you explain to me how "fossils", which are fossilized bugs and animal remains dug up from graves, can transition or evolve over millions and even billions of years from a simpler state, into a another more complex species; like gorilla fossils to human?

I said already that I agree with evolutionists that no animal of any kind has ever speciated, turned, morphed or gave birth to another completely different species, .. so this is about what Evolutionists Scientist use as "evidence of Evolution", .. fossils.

Thank you.
 
Upvote 0

Bungle_Bear

Whoot!
Mar 6, 2011
9,084
3,513
✟262,640.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
No. We are are not descendants of gorillas. Gorillas and humans have a common ancestor.

as in "a population of gorillas, over millions of years evolved into a population of humans
If you replace "gorillas" with our common ancestor, then that is correct. Populations evolve, individuals do not.
 
Upvote 0

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,204
7,479
31
Wales
✟429,436.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single

I don't believe in evolution, I accept it.
But what I don't accept is your messed up version of evolution. Humans didn't evolve from gorillas. We evolved from a common ancestor that we shared with gorillas.
 
Upvote 0

Jimmy D

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2014
5,147
5,995
✟277,099.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
OK, before you guys have me kicked off this Forum, .. again:

I doubt anyone wants you kicked off the forum.

Do you, or do you not believe in the Evolution theory

Yep, although it's probably more accurate to say I "accept it" due to the preponderance of evidence and to a lesser extent, the lack of a credible alternative explanation.


I'm not really sure what you're asking for.
 
Upvote 0

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
39,618
29,191
Pacific Northwest
✟816,268.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
I don't know if it's deliberate or not, but you twist pretty much everything that anyone says and play back a parody of what has actually been posted. Like I said, strawmen are much more amusing than reality.

That's the MO of that particular poster.

-CryptoLutheran
 
Reactions: Arius
Upvote 0

Arius

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 31, 2017
681
201
Phoenix
✟149,280.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Marital Status
Married
No. We are are not descendants of gorillas. Gorillas and humans have a common ancestor.


If you replace "gorillas" with our common ancestor, then that is correct. Populations evolve, individuals do not.

Thank you, .. is what I wanted to hear, nice of you to admit it LOL.

Remember sheeple, there is no "you" in the new human population, it's one for all and all for one, and one is all; dumb animals, every one of us.

I'm not even going to ask what species that "common ancestor" was. Probably an empty clone, .. lol.
 
Upvote 0

Arius

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 31, 2017
681
201
Phoenix
✟149,280.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Marital Status
Married
I don't believe in evolution, I accept it.

Yes, I understand, I grew up in a strict Religion too. It's called "blind faith", we don't have a choice but to accept it.

But what I don't accept is your messed up version of evolution. Humans didn't evolve from gorillas. We evolved from a common ancestor that we shared with gorillas.

Like I told Bungle Bear, I won't even ask what "species" that population of animal that "common ancestor" was, .. human, gorilla, .. what? .. lol.

Hey, thank you guys for helping me get people to open their eyes.
But don't worry, neither an Evolutionist or a Christian will click on a "like" or an "agree" button in support of such wonderful revelations, .. they can't, just like you pointed it out above.[/QUOTE]
 
Upvote 0

Arius

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 31, 2017
681
201
Phoenix
✟149,280.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Marital Status
Married
I doubt anyone wants you kicked off the forum.
Thank you.

Yep, although it's probably more accurate to say I "accept it" due to the preponderance of evidence and to a lesser extent, the lack of a credible alternative explanation.

OK, so you too ay? It's that population of animals called "Common Ancestor" that got you, isn't it?

I know you are not allowed to answer this, but what the heck, I'll ask you anyways: "Have you any idea what 'species' that 'population of animals' who Evolutionists call Common Ancestor were?"

I'm not really sure what you're asking for.

I spelled it out, .. and it's the same thing I am asking all of you Evolutionists: "What species of animals were the creatures that walked the earth that Evolutionists refer to as "common ancestor"?

Example: Were they gorilla, lizard, human, Nephilim, .. what?

OK here is a documentary, you guys say that man did NOT evolve from gorillas, so what gorilla/human looking creatures were these shown in this video?


I believe she is referring to them as Neanderthals, .. but what "species" were they? Human or gorilla, .. or what? See the skull the lady is holding, she believes these were our ancestors, so for Pete sake, what "species" were these "common ancestors"???

Is "common ancestor" a species between every species before they turn into a completely different species?
Is "species" a type of species? How else could I put this?


Dawkins says: "More distantly related are gorillas" and points to a 'T', and calls this evolving gorilla "Common Ancestor" Time 0:43

What "species" was this common ancestor??
 
Upvote 0

Arius

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 31, 2017
681
201
Phoenix
✟149,280.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Marital Status
Married
Again:


Time 0:21 "We did not descend from chimpanzees we both (humans and chips) descended from a "Common Ancestor, who lived (points to a 'T' on the graph) there!"

Now for the final time, "what species" was this animal/creature that your Pastor Dawkins is pointing to, which he calls "Common Ancestor"?
 
Upvote 0

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,204
7,479
31
Wales
✟429,436.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
Yes, I understand, I grew up in a strict Religion too. It's called "blind faith", we don't have a choice but to accept it.

No, my acceptance of evolution is not religious. It's looking at the evidence that is given by scientists and agreeing with that they say.

[/QUOTE]

God, you're unbelievably dense.
 
Reactions: Larniavc
Upvote 0

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,204
7,479
31
Wales
✟429,436.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
Remember sheeple, there is no "you" in the new human population, it's one for all and all for one, and one is all; dumb animals, every one of us.

When people like you make that sort of comment, all it does is show how you really think. Nothing else.
 
Upvote 0

doubtingmerle

I'll think about it.
Site Supporter
Jan 28, 2003
9,969
2,521
Pennsylvania
Visit site
✟534,373.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Now for the final time, "what species" was this animal/creature that your Pastor Dawkins is pointing to, which he calls "Common Ancestor"?
You are looking for the name of a species that has not yet been found? It does not work that way. When someone finds the new species, then it will be named.

We have found many intermediates between us and the common ancestor with gorillas. Those have been named.

How can you explain that we found those intermediates?
 
Upvote 0

Arius

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 31, 2017
681
201
Phoenix
✟149,280.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Marital Status
Married

Awesome, .. let's call this Common Ancestor "Intermediates", or the "unfound species", or, "the Missing Link", .. alright, good, .. let's go with that.
Now they have the skull of this "Intermediate, unfound species AKA Missing Link", .. now can they tell what species it is?
Is it gorilla, is it human, or is it a Nephilim, .. what?

I know this much, that todays scientists can tell from bones they study what species it belongs to, especially a skull. So what do they say this skull is, .. a gorilla, or human?

They tell us that it, .. whatever this "mystery" species is, .. evolved into human, .. that much we know. That it is our ancestor, so going by that, they found a human skull, .. whooppedidooda! They can dig up any human grave and find all kinds of different human skulls, like the Aborigines they murdered and boiled down their skulls, they looked something like that too, only problem is that they too were human.

Here is your problem, if we say that this "missing link" species is a gorilla, then it's a gorilla skull, and the millions and billions of years it was buried in the ground was a skull of a gorilla, .. so what? Where does this prove "Evolution/Speciation" that justifies these God, and humans haters to call me an animal of the gorilla family, and call my ancestors rats!?
 
Upvote 0

Arius

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 31, 2017
681
201
Phoenix
✟149,280.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Marital Status
Married
No, my acceptance of evolution is not religious. It's looking at the evidence that is given by scientists and agreeing with that they say

I was quoting your scientists and what they say, .. that is what my part of the debate is about, what "they say", .. so what is it that they say, .. I'm still waiting??

I pointed out "what he, the most famous Evolutionary scientist of your day" said in the above video when he pointed to a branching off, a "T" which comes from gorillas, then branches off, one goes to human, and the other to chimp and bonobo.
He called this "T" (aka branching off) a "Common Ancestor". He did not provide a Peleoartist rendered image of this creature, which is why I'm asking you; what does your Religion say that this creature, this animal or whatever it is that you call "Common Ancestor" is? Is it human, is it a gorilla, is it a puma, a rat, a Jew (we have been labeled many different species many times over the thousands of years), so .. what is the "T" that Dawkins is pointing at??

Wait, .. maybe Dawkins means it is not even an animal, but maybe an alien creature from Tatooine! You know, that New planet NASA just discovered in the pile of artist rendered paintings!?

God, you're unbelievably dense.

Coming from a member of this Religious Cult called "Evolution", .. I say that is a complement. A step down from calling me an animal of the ape family, who's "not so distant" cousins are gorillas and rats. Have you seen Dawkins depiction of that white middle-aged woman's "Family photo collage" amongst apes and chimps and other hairy animals? If that lady was a real person, I suggest she sue the pants of Dawkins. Why didn't he put 'his' picture in there, with his ape wife and kids, .. huh?

Hasn't this Religion degraded, humiliated and sacrificed enough innocent lives over its relatively short existence?
Do you want me to show you more evidence what believers of this Religion have done throughout its History? Because I can!
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.