Die hard 4?

[Billnew]

http://entertainment.msn.com/movies/hotgossipc5

In other remake news, Bruce Willis, apparently determined to wring every last dollar out of the "Die Hard" franchise, is moving forward with plans for another installment. "'Die Hard 4' is being written as we speak, and if all goes well we'll be shooting it in [the fall]...," he's quoted as telling Britain's Radio 1. "John McClane has retired as a cop, and that's all that the film company [has] allowed me to tell you about it."

Another one?

One was great, two was okay, three had its interesting points,
But is there life for 4?

 

[SUNSTONE]

The first one is arguably the greatest action movie ever.
The second one I didn't like at all.
The third one, with Samuel L Jackson, was awesome!
I would like to see another one made.

 

[Billnew]

To me they have to out do the last, (which isn't true.)
Bigger destruction, more enemys to kill, more people affected.

The first was a high rise, a few innocent people killed, and the roof blown off of the high rise.
the second was an airport with several airliners
involved. Several planes and parts of the airport destroyed.

I don't remember much of 3 though. But it seems like they were going for bigger again.

Sequals don't have to be biggger. They must be as interesting and exciting. But not
necessarily bigger.
If they continue the formula, they would have to have a nuke, or biological agent in
a large group of people. And several explosions.
A good story with good effects to go along with the story is fine.

 

[Sors]

The first one was a masterpiece. The two others were enjoyable action movies. I would expect this one to be just that. Enjoyable.

Sors

 

[Rik]

I thought the first one, on the USS Missouri was great. The second one, on the train was pretty good too...oh wait a minute, I'm so confused by all these "1 man against a terrorist army, cut off from the rest of the world" movies...