Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Did Jesus believe in a literal Noah's Ark and Flood?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jase" data-source="post: 25415614" data-attributes="member: 7190"><p>It is impossible? So in other words, you are claiming that every single Christian who accepts Evolution, isn't actually a Christian, and only those in the Bible Belt of the U.S. who reject evolution based on strawman arguments are? Microevolution and Macroevolution work on the exact same principles. They are fundamentally no different. And no one even knows what a "kind" is.</p><p> </p><p> Where does evolution claim a fish became an ape which became a man? </p><p> </p><p> There is no such distinction between Micro and Macro. They work on the same principles. You are arguing a strawman.</p><p> </p><p> A tool to which you will easily accept if it doesn't disagree with your preconceived worldview, but reject if it does - despite there being no difference in how those theories you disagree with are proven, compared to those you do agree with.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jase, post: 25415614, member: 7190"] It is impossible? So in other words, you are claiming that every single Christian who accepts Evolution, isn't actually a Christian, and only those in the Bible Belt of the U.S. who reject evolution based on strawman arguments are? Microevolution and Macroevolution work on the exact same principles. They are fundamentally no different. And no one even knows what a "kind" is. Where does evolution claim a fish became an ape which became a man? There is no such distinction between Micro and Macro. They work on the same principles. You are arguing a strawman. A tool to which you will easily accept if it doesn't disagree with your preconceived worldview, but reject if it does - despite there being no difference in how those theories you disagree with are proven, compared to those you do agree with. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Did Jesus believe in a literal Noah's Ark and Flood?
Top
Bottom