Hi there,
So I had this simple insight (which I wanted to share with the Physical and Life Science forum, but moreso you - the believers - first) that evolution can explain "Creation". Creation, if you will, is the use of design, to differentiate the predicted but alternative "Evolutions", so as to ascertain the value of those Evolutions, as pertains to the most agreeable Evolutions (with other Evolutions like them). Evolution, in a sense, is gathered by Creation in disparate groups and weighed one Evolution against another (Evolution) to ascertain which combination is the most likely, to allow the Creation to flourish. If the Creation can flourish, then it's adaptive strength is able to exceed the limitations of both Evolution and Creation together - thus ensuring that the strengths of the species are passed down from generation to generation.
Now of course, once the Design starts approving certain Evolutions and not others, a baseline of adaptability is able to be discerned, which drives the Design forward, in a way that having no design could ever achieve. In fact even discovering Design, can be described in an evolutionary way: being a response to a selection pressure, repurposed between one selection pressure and another, for which it was also "evolutionarily" suitable. It is 'Evolutionary suitability' then that comes to dominate the arch-culture, drawing in those things that answer to Design, whether evolved one way or another. This is not a mistake, if the presence of an "evolution" is not understood to inspire, but to create negative space around those adaptations that prove most Evolutionarily complete - it is not necessary for Evolution to "keep" evolving only point to that which is most relevant to Design. Ruthless as it may be, this in turn helps culture keep its specieal focus on the health and defence of its members.
The conclusion then, is that Creation is an adaptation of adaptations - a greater acceptance of change, that itself vets its develop relative to the flourishing that the Evolutionary cropping can induce. Where Evolution does not crop something, it itself is cropped. The fitness of the species, thus, is one of its highest expectations and the possibility of exercising that fitness a natural good, whether in relation to its Design, place in the Blueprint or entry into Culture. This then branches in a number of ways, that in turn validates pre-emptive preference for certain Creative solutions to a species' flourishing needs, that is: those solutions vetted by Evolution as both compatible with the species but also suggestive of the Direction of its advancement. Maintaining that Direction cultivates a strength in other kinds of the species, whose adaptations can benefit from the shared intel of a species that can communicate it - relative to the Design, that vets its Evolution in relation to itself.
If I was to summarize this, the easiest way would be to say "Creation steers Evolution, until both conditions (represented) validate the preeminence of a particular Attraction - when a species does this, it is at its most flourishing".
Live long and prosper.
So I had this simple insight (which I wanted to share with the Physical and Life Science forum, but moreso you - the believers - first) that evolution can explain "Creation". Creation, if you will, is the use of design, to differentiate the predicted but alternative "Evolutions", so as to ascertain the value of those Evolutions, as pertains to the most agreeable Evolutions (with other Evolutions like them). Evolution, in a sense, is gathered by Creation in disparate groups and weighed one Evolution against another (Evolution) to ascertain which combination is the most likely, to allow the Creation to flourish. If the Creation can flourish, then it's adaptive strength is able to exceed the limitations of both Evolution and Creation together - thus ensuring that the strengths of the species are passed down from generation to generation.
- There are a number of selection pressures
- There are a collection of responses to those selection pressures
- Creation differentiates those pressures and their respective responses, relative to Design
- The differentiated groups are then tested against their implicit connection with Design, in their various places
- The most Evolved groups in connection with Design, are then incorporated into the blueprint for the species
- This blueprint is tested during mating season
- The manner in which different mates succeed mating season, contributes to the arch-culture of preferred adaptations, for the species
Now of course, once the Design starts approving certain Evolutions and not others, a baseline of adaptability is able to be discerned, which drives the Design forward, in a way that having no design could ever achieve. In fact even discovering Design, can be described in an evolutionary way: being a response to a selection pressure, repurposed between one selection pressure and another, for which it was also "evolutionarily" suitable. It is 'Evolutionary suitability' then that comes to dominate the arch-culture, drawing in those things that answer to Design, whether evolved one way or another. This is not a mistake, if the presence of an "evolution" is not understood to inspire, but to create negative space around those adaptations that prove most Evolutionarily complete - it is not necessary for Evolution to "keep" evolving only point to that which is most relevant to Design. Ruthless as it may be, this in turn helps culture keep its specieal focus on the health and defence of its members.
The conclusion then, is that Creation is an adaptation of adaptations - a greater acceptance of change, that itself vets its develop relative to the flourishing that the Evolutionary cropping can induce. Where Evolution does not crop something, it itself is cropped. The fitness of the species, thus, is one of its highest expectations and the possibility of exercising that fitness a natural good, whether in relation to its Design, place in the Blueprint or entry into Culture. This then branches in a number of ways, that in turn validates pre-emptive preference for certain Creative solutions to a species' flourishing needs, that is: those solutions vetted by Evolution as both compatible with the species but also suggestive of the Direction of its advancement. Maintaining that Direction cultivates a strength in other kinds of the species, whose adaptations can benefit from the shared intel of a species that can communicate it - relative to the Design, that vets its Evolution in relation to itself.
If I was to summarize this, the easiest way would be to say "Creation steers Evolution, until both conditions (represented) validate the preeminence of a particular Attraction - when a species does this, it is at its most flourishing".
Live long and prosper.