- Apr 19, 2012
- 32,840
- 6,419
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Libertarian
Foe one thing it will be ureasonable and impartical to try and deport everyone first thing.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Foe one thing it will be ureasonable and impartical to try and deport everyone first thing.And where did you get this information?
Probably most of those who came here legally, and learned English, agree with that.See I believe that if you are going to come here you should make an effort to learn English like real effort ( if for nothing else so you can communicate out in soceity. Even if the person never wishes to become a citizen which with VERY few exceptions to become a citizen you MUST know English as both an oral and written test is required. The exception is for elderly people looking o become a citizen. Still why would you come here and NOT at least try to learn the anguage even if you had NO plans to ever beome and citizen,
If the Trump administration actually goes so far as to mandate the use of e-verify I will be astonished and repent of my cynicism about Republican immigration policy.I'm actually okay with separating them out. Let's start with the criminals that have done things to land themselves in jail. I say let them finish their sentences and then be deported. I would then begin with the gangs like MS13 who are filled with illegals.
Once that has been completed we start working on those who aren't violent offenders, but are still here illegally. I would combine that with strict enforcement against any business who has hired them. Including making the businesses check to see if the person is legal through the verify procedure.
I would leave asylees alone at this point.
A progressive approach combined with enforcement against businesses will begin to alter the landscape for the future.
IF they are granted asylum they can seek it all day long, but there is still a proccess/That's exactly why it's the asylum seekers have to go, but not the illegals. You can call asylum seekers "illegal" all you want, but the fact is that they are here legally and cannot be exploited in that way.
Certainly. But there are those who are going to exploit any compromise.Part of the "middle ground" solution could be a much stricter regime for who gets into the country going forward and how the law deals with them.
So would illegals who are in ESL classes around the country or are on waiting lists for them.Probably most of those who came here legally, and learned English, agree with that.
Yes there is, and it is being followed, but the process is slow and the number of people trying to follow it is overwhelming.IF they are granted asylum they can seek it all day long, but there is still a proccess/
which would certainly make sense at least at the start.That sounds reasonable. Right now I'm pretty sure Trump and Homan are out to remove those who are an actual menace to society.
So? Anticipate it and cut off routes for exploitation. Adapt, adjust. Its how we do this kind of thing.Certainly. But there are those who are going to exploit any compromise.
I think they're going to have their hands full with just that for quite a while.which would certainly make sense at least at the start.
I wonder if they could/would start deporting people without having them do sentences here.I think they're going to have their hands full with just that for quite a while.
It depends on how far over backwards they're willing to bend. Like I said, most of these folks knew what they were doing was illegal and that they could get deported. If I decided to move to Canada illegally, I wouldn't be saying that I was being treated unfairly if they sent me back here. I'd say oh well I gave it a shot and it didn't workout.So? Anticipate it and cut off routes for exploitation. Adapt, adjust. Its how we do this kind of thing.
I agree they knew te risk the question really is are we willing to expect people to rat or go door to door. I say we give those here long term a path to citizenship NOT allow them to stay here without it and tighten the border.It depends on how far over backwards they're willing to bend. Like I said, most of these folks knew what they were doing was illegal and that they could get deported. If I decided to move to Canada illegally, I wouldn't be saying that I was being treated unfairly if they sent me back here. I'd say oh well I gave it a shot and it didn't workout.
That sounds like big strain on recourses.I wonder if they could/would start deporting people without having them do sentences here.
How so? I would think it would be cheaper. Honest questionThat sounds like big strain on recourses.
It would violate the equal protection clause. A citizen or permanent resident who commits a crime has to serve a prison sentence. An illegal alien who commits the same crime is merely sent back to his home country free and clear?That sounds like big strain on recourses.
How so? I misread your post, that's how. Let me try it again.How so? I would think it would be cheaper. Honest question.
That would be much more efficient, expedient, and cost effective.I wonder if they could/would start deporting people without having them do sentences here.
Well, I am not sure if it would really be free and clear as if they were deported there would still be a record meaning they would get in even MORE trouble if they came over here again.It would violate the equal protection clause. A citizen or permanent resident who commits a crime has to serve a prison sentence. An illegal alien who commits the same crime is merely sent back to his home country free and clear?
For each year an inmate is in prison it costs usually 10,000s to keep them locked up if we deport them we would spend the money once.How so? I misread your post, that's how. Let me try it again.
That would be much more efficient, expedient, and cost effective.
Big deal. The point is they have escaped just punishment that US citizens and legal residents have to endure. If I go to another state and am arrested for commiting a crime there, the authorities are not going to say, "Oh, he is not a resident of this state, let's just send him back to where he came from."Well, I am not sure if it would really be free and clear as if they were deported there would still be a record meaning they would get in even MORE trouble if they came over here again.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?