H
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Holcomb said:What's the reason for being able to depict the Father (like in the Sistene Chapel, for instance)? I know we can depict Christ because of the Incarnation, but what about God the Father? He doesn't have a body, does He?
I don't think it's a sin to depict the Father, but I'm more comfortable it not be done. It's not traditional in the East to depict the Father.QuantaCura said:No, but Biblically he is described in human terms. I don't see the difference between using that imagery and symbolism in a painting or in a text.
I was hoping to add some levity...If the picture bothers people, I remove it.
Veritas_et_Puritas said:The issue with depicting Christ is this: since He is both fully human and fully Divine, He was therefore made fully Incarnate in human form and it is possible to depict Him. Indeed, when the issue of iconoclasm arose, it was also argued that it is necessary to depict Christ lest His fullness of humanity become denigrated. That said, we must keep in mind how we depict Him - icons, for example, are prime examples of beautiful expressions of both Christ's divinity and humanity.
InnerPhyre said:Don't like it at all. Never have.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?