Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Leisure and Society
Society
History & Genealogy
Denying the Holodomor
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Voegelin" data-source="post: 1057071" data-attributes="member: 11257"><p>The Sulzberger family owns the voting stock. Arthur Sulzberger Jr. is the nominal publisher.</p><p></p><p>"Holocaust" is a neologism coined in the 1970s. </p><p></p><p>Arthur "Pinch" Sulzberger did, a few years back, claim the worst misinformation his family's paper put out was not reporting on the "Holocaust."</p><p></p><p>But that is not true. The paper did report on Jews under Nazi Germany. Yes, the term "holocaust" was not used because it had not been invented.</p><p></p><p>But the Times did hold back on the plight of Jews in Germany during WWII. There were reasons for this. Mainly that, with hundreds of thousands, millions of others being murdered, it would not be productive to concentrate on Jewish suffering. There was also the fear that, if the Times did harp on Jews, Nazis would make things even worse. </p><p></p><p>The fact is that the New York Times did try to alleviate the suffering of Jews during the war.</p><p></p><p>But the New York Times repressed the murder of over 7 million Christians over a decade earlier.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Voegelin, post: 1057071, member: 11257"] The Sulzberger family owns the voting stock. Arthur Sulzberger Jr. is the nominal publisher. "Holocaust" is a neologism coined in the 1970s. Arthur "Pinch" Sulzberger did, a few years back, claim the worst misinformation his family's paper put out was not reporting on the "Holocaust." But that is not true. The paper did report on Jews under Nazi Germany. Yes, the term "holocaust" was not used because it had not been invented. But the Times did hold back on the plight of Jews in Germany during WWII. There were reasons for this. Mainly that, with hundreds of thousands, millions of others being murdered, it would not be productive to concentrate on Jewish suffering. There was also the fear that, if the Times did harp on Jews, Nazis would make things even worse. The fact is that the New York Times did try to alleviate the suffering of Jews during the war. But the New York Times repressed the murder of over 7 million Christians over a decade earlier. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Leisure and Society
Society
History & Genealogy
Denying the Holodomor
Top
Bottom