Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Which shows that many people are fools. If one is in a 'safe' state, safe for either side, then it makes sense to vote third party if you do not like either major party candidate. Your vote was already 'wasted'.I largely agree, just that I see the Electoral College as one more "road block." The fact remains, people tend to think that voting for a third party candidate is "wasting their vote," in large part because of the Electoral College (where if you don't vote for the winner in your state, your vote has no power), regardless of who wins the Presidency.
But that's not any different from any other election. What you described applies just as much to the governor, Senator, or (if your state has elections for them) State Supreme Court Justice elections: "If you don't vote for the winner in your state, your vote has no power". Swap out "state" for "district" and you described the House of Representatives and all of the state legislatures. There's nothing different about the electoral college here.
Hmm, doesn't the Constitution protect us from unconstitutional laws? Maybe not all of the time depending on one's perspective but at least there is some kind of litmus test to protect us from dictatorship.There's the deal breaker - "while also respecting the rules of the Constitution" Those who want majority rule have no respect for the constitution, or you.
"Two wolves and a lamb deciding on dinner "
True, and follow their law whether in the majority or the minority because they claim to be the people who put into law God's will. It really should be the will of the People in the majority that sets the standards. I have a feeling you may agree but I would be interested in why someone would disagree even if it's a projectionConservatives still espouse the Rule-of-Law, only it’s turned out to mean they want to Rule and the rest of us have to follow the Law.
Hereditary rule I would think though I am only semi-Dune literate. It's such a long book.Why does Dune pop to mind?
Can you imagine Donald Trump’s outrage if he actually won the popular vote but lost the electoral college?
America isn’t a democracy anyway.
Obama was declared the winner of the election on Tuesdayafter multiple networks declared he won Ohio, thus weighting the electoral mapin his favor. Romney was still leading in the popular vote shortly after midnight.Trump called the Electoral College “a disaster for ademocracy … a total sham and a travesty.”
Obama was declared the winner of the election on Tuesdayafter multiple networks declared he won Ohio, thus weighting the electoral mapin his favor. Romney was still leading in the popular vote shortly after midnight.Trump called the Electoral College “a disaster for ademocracy … a total sham and a travesty.”
If you read the thread you would know.What do you think democracy is?
-CryptoLutheran
America is not a direct democracy. A constitutional republic is a form of representational democracy so America is a democracy.America isn’t a democracy anyway.
In this context, America is not a direct democracy addresses the point.America is not a direct democracy. A constitutional republic is a form of representational democracy so America is a democracy.
And the "we're a republic not a democracy!" is a distinction without a difference as democracy in common usage is referring to the US version of that form of government.In this context, America is not a direct democracy addresses the point.
Common usage wasn’t relevant in this context.And the "we're a republic not a democracy!" is a distinction without a difference as democracy in common usage is referring to the US version of that form of government.
Sure was.Common usage wasn’t relevant in this context.
Nope, read the messages.Sure was.
Pfft. Your minority rule is two wolves and a flock of lambs deciding on dinner.There's the deal breaker - "while also respecting the rules of the Constitution" Those who want majority rule have no respect for the constitution, or you.
"Two wolves and a lamb deciding on dinner "
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?