Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Democrats questioned the elections first
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Desk trauma" data-source="post: 76304684" data-attributes="member: 297432"><p>Freed from the electoral college those values would be represented in the presidential elections results on par with the number of people who hold them and vote based upon them. Why should some peoples votes be amplified and others reduced in value?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Neither California nor Wyoming share any set of values, they are geographic areas. The people of those states hold values as individuals and vote based upon them.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Low population state voters would have their votes be equal to those of high population states, that would be fair when everyone in the country is voting for the same office.</p><p></p><p>The senate would remain to check high vs low population state imbalances at the federal level. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That would be an improvement but why keep the relic around at all?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Desk trauma, post: 76304684, member: 297432"] Freed from the electoral college those values would be represented in the presidential elections results on par with the number of people who hold them and vote based upon them. Why should some peoples votes be amplified and others reduced in value? Neither California nor Wyoming share any set of values, they are geographic areas. The people of those states hold values as individuals and vote based upon them. Low population state voters would have their votes be equal to those of high population states, that would be fair when everyone in the country is voting for the same office. The senate would remain to check high vs low population state imbalances at the federal level. That would be an improvement but why keep the relic around at all? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Democrats questioned the elections first
Top
Bottom