Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
Defending a religious person...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="seeking Christ" data-source="post: 62363393"><p>This entire inquisition of yours is ENTIRELY out of line in this thread, in this sub-forum, and as far as the context of what was said. What happened was somebody said my position (which happens to agree with yours on the point, btw) is SO unorthodox as to be irrelevant. I said that's not so, and I am correct.</p><p></p><p>Not an item you have raised has one iota to do with real life. It might as well be arguing about how many angels fit on the head of a pin. This is exactly what I referred to when I said I have no "religion," which you took offense to. You may care about these things and i don't condemn you for it, and obviously I have explored the depths of theology in great detail and know quite well what place they have but at the end of the day it JUST DOESN'T MATTER. When I made reference to agreeing with orthodoxy, it was referring to things that actually matter rather than divisive tripe.</p><p></p><p>And there are quite a few EO's who will tell you the filioque wasn't worth schisming over, where do you think I got that from?</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>A strawman; I never said it, you have no reason to attack it and you have no reason to attack me. Normally you're above that stuff.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Exactly how much attention do you think our Lord pays to these things? Clearly He ignores them. That puts me in some mighty good company.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="seeking Christ, post: 62363393"] This entire inquisition of yours is ENTIRELY out of line in this thread, in this sub-forum, and as far as the context of what was said. What happened was somebody said my position (which happens to agree with yours on the point, btw) is SO unorthodox as to be irrelevant. I said that's not so, and I am correct. Not an item you have raised has one iota to do with real life. It might as well be arguing about how many angels fit on the head of a pin. This is exactly what I referred to when I said I have no "religion," which you took offense to. You may care about these things and i don't condemn you for it, and obviously I have explored the depths of theology in great detail and know quite well what place they have but at the end of the day it JUST DOESN'T MATTER. When I made reference to agreeing with orthodoxy, it was referring to things that actually matter rather than divisive tripe. And there are quite a few EO's who will tell you the filioque wasn't worth schisming over, where do you think I got that from? A strawman; I never said it, you have no reason to attack it and you have no reason to attack me. Normally you're above that stuff. Exactly how much attention do you think our Lord pays to these things? Clearly He ignores them. That puts me in some mighty good company. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
Defending a religious person...
Top
Bottom