Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
Defending a religious person...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Catherineanne" data-source="post: 62361833" data-attributes="member: 83057"><p>No, the East would NOT say any of that. Orthodoxy is very clear on this one; it says that the filioque is a theological error, and ought never to have been added to the Nicene Creed. </p><p> </p><p>Rome on the other hand is clear that the filioque belongs.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Neither Rome nor Orthodoxy would see this as nitpicking. This is a substantive issue, and they disagree on it.</p><p> </p><p>How can you be at the same theological position, when you agree with neither of them? Earthly language is perfectly capable of saying yes or no to this one proposition. You claimed to agree 100% with everyone, but you can't do that when there are very clear divisions between denominations.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>I am not fabricating anything. I am using actual distinctions between denominations to illustrate the patent impossibility of anyone on earth agreeing 100% with every denomination. It simply cannot be done, because there are a series of mutually incompatible beliefs to choose between.</p><p> </p><p>I think you are either unaware of these incompatible elements or else are choosing to ignore them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Catherineanne, post: 62361833, member: 83057"] No, the East would NOT say any of that. Orthodoxy is very clear on this one; it says that the filioque is a theological error, and ought never to have been added to the Nicene Creed. Rome on the other hand is clear that the filioque belongs. Neither Rome nor Orthodoxy would see this as nitpicking. This is a substantive issue, and they disagree on it. How can you be at the same theological position, when you agree with neither of them? Earthly language is perfectly capable of saying yes or no to this one proposition. You claimed to agree 100% with everyone, but you can't do that when there are very clear divisions between denominations. I am not fabricating anything. I am using actual distinctions between denominations to illustrate the patent impossibility of anyone on earth agreeing 100% with every denomination. It simply cannot be done, because there are a series of mutually incompatible beliefs to choose between. I think you are either unaware of these incompatible elements or else are choosing to ignore them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
Defending a religious person...
Top
Bottom