Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
Defending a religious person...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="seeking Christ" data-source="post: 62360650"><p>It means it is a matter of no or little import. Most in the East will say the same, and that Unity would have been preferable to schism over this. Also, neither the East nor the West is 100% in line with <strong>itself</strong>, as I'm sure you can know, by a perusing of this website if nothing else.</p><p></p><p>So you may pick at nits, but that's all you're doing with these items. I independently arrived at the same <em>theological positions</em> they did, and God is certainly more than large enough to house them all, to be represented by them all. Earthly language is imperfect to address the substance of it anyway.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>I don't see how any of those can be considered orthodox, and yet none of those ranks object to my stance on the matter. You seem to be fabricating distinctions where there are none.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>Again, I have no idea what you might be referring to with your "modern charisms." (Neither has anyone else attempting to discuss it with me, but I digress)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="seeking Christ, post: 62360650"] It means it is a matter of no or little import. Most in the East will say the same, and that Unity would have been preferable to schism over this. Also, neither the East nor the West is 100% in line with [B]itself[/B], as I'm sure you can know, by a perusing of this website if nothing else. So you may pick at nits, but that's all you're doing with these items. I independently arrived at the same [I]theological positions[/I] they did, and God is certainly more than large enough to house them all, to be represented by them all. Earthly language is imperfect to address the substance of it anyway. I don't see how any of those can be considered orthodox, and yet none of those ranks object to my stance on the matter. You seem to be fabricating distinctions where there are none. Again, I have no idea what you might be referring to with your "modern charisms." (Neither has anyone else attempting to discuss it with me, but I digress) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
Defending a religious person...
Top
Bottom