Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Are counts of impact craters on the Moon and the other planets a geological dating method? Is radiometric dating of Moon rocks and meteorites a geological dating method?joshua, I specifically stated geologic dating methods in the OP. Please stay on topic.
Are counts of impact craters on the Moon and the other planets a geological dating method?
Is radiometric dating of Moon rocks and meteorites a geological dating method?
I believe the atonement is two fold. Jesus died to reconcile us with the father. He also died to reconcile us with each other. He is building His temple one stone at a time and it is always interesting to know what God is doing in the lives of our fellow Christians. That is why we are to always be ready to give our testimony to share with others what God is doing in our lives. Notice how when people decide to become atheists and they reject God that also is two fold. They not only reject God but they reject the people of God. Sometimes their problems are with God the Father, sometimes their problems are with Christians and the people of God. But they seem to reject both. Although in some cases they are having problems with people that claim to be christian and are not. Usually they are sincere seeks that are lost but trying to find their way.and why must we necessarily find the truth (written) in distributed book(s)?!, i don't say there is no such, but why must the truth be found in distributed book(s) so that it may only then be admitted?!, when we delve into such things, we actually deal with science, it is written "God is love", and: "these three things abide: faith, hope, and love", while the science(knowledge) has been designated objectionable as a direction of (the) faith, so if we deal with such a "tree", then it will be right we make it good
Merry Christmas
Blessings
They can be, but just like the radiometric dating they depend heavy on human opinions. The average person in America knows that there is a lot of fraud and takes things with a grain of salt and at least some skepticism. It is fairly easy to do the math of when the earth and moon were formed because of the receding rate of the moon and the spin down rate of the earth. You can figure it out with very basic math that any 8th grader can handle.Are counts of impact craters on the Moon and the other planets a geological dating method? Is radiometric dating of Moon rocks and meteorites a geological dating method?
They can be, but just like the radiometric dating they depend heavy on human opinions. The average person in America knows that there is a lot of fraud and takes things with a grain of salt and at least some skepticism. It is fairly easy to do the math of when the earth and moon were formed because of the receding rate of the moon and the spin down rate of the earth. You can figure it out with very basic math that any 8th grader can handle.
They can be, but just like the radiometric dating they depend heavy on human opinions. The average person in America knows that there is a lot of fraud and takes things with a grain of salt and at least some skepticism. It is fairly easy to do the math of when the earth and moon were formed because of the receding rate of the moon and the spin down rate of the earth. You can figure it out with very basic math that any 8th grader can handle.
The recession of the Moon is a different matter from chronology based on counts of impact craters, but it is still of interest.They can be, but just like the radiometric dating they depend heavy on human opinions. The average person in America knows that there is a lot of fraud and takes things with a grain of salt and at least some skepticism. It is fairly easy to do the math of when the earth and moon were formed because of the receding rate of the moon and the spin down rate of the earth. You can figure it out with very basic math that any 8th grader can handle.
Some strata containing dinosaur fossils are dated at 65+ MY's old. It is presumed that radiometric dating was used to determine those ages.
BUT
Recent discoveries show dinosaur bones can contain preserved blood vessels and soft tissue....which shouldn't be there if the strata the fossils were found in were really that old.
That makes one question the radiometric dating techniques.
Bahahahah! This is logic turned on it's head.
Let's see, Dr. Schweitzer's discovery of preserved fragments of soft tissue in MOR-1125 means:
1. What we thought about the preservation of soft tissue under certain conditions was wrong.
or
2. Everything we know about radiometric dating and the age of the earth is wrong.
Seems like William of Occam might have some input on which choice makes more sense.
Hey atheist dude...how did the tissue survive for moe than 65+ M I L L I O N Y E A R S ?
How long does soft tissue normally survive?
Not 65+ millions of years.
...how did the tissue survive for moe than 65+ M I L L I O N Y E A R S ?
Not 65+ millions of years. This is why the evo-minded are scrambling for answers. Be proud in the bible. It's telling the truth.
So how long, then?
And more importantly, most dinosaur fossils do not have soft tissue in them. Why is that only the case with a small few? Wouildn't that indicate that there's some sort of process going on with the small few that keeps it from happening in the vast majority of dinosaur fossils we find?
Come to think of it, why is it always dinosaurs? We find bones - not fossils, but actual bones - of animals like mammoths and smilodons, and they don't have soft tissue on them.
Come to think of it even more, why do we find unfossilized bones of mammoths at all? Why do we only find unfossilized bones of animals that are higher up in the geologic column, like humans and mammoths and giant slothes, but we only find fossils of fone animals that lower, like dinosaurs?
Please review the OP and what it specifically asks for us to discuss and not to discuss. Do you have a dating method you would like to discuss? Your cooperation and contributions specific to the topic of this thread are appreciated.
I truly believe that if Jesus came back and repeated everything He did in the Gospels, the scientists today would call for His crucifixion.I don't really care if we find tons of soft tissue or just one. Th problem for the old earthers...is THEY FIND SOFT TISSUE.
I truly believe that if Jesus came back and repeated everything He did in the Gospels, the scientists today would call for His crucifixion.
And moreso if He convinced them beyond a shadow of a doubt that He was God in the flesh.
I can just hear them:
"Why did You let [x] happen?"
"Why did You deceive us?"
"Why did You deceive my grandkids? Now they're in Hell!"
"Why did You give us two creation accounts?"
"Why did You commit genocide, infanticide, and allow incest?"
"Why did [yada yada]?"
We've been discussing the soft tissue dating method. The soft tissue found in dino...and other fossils...clearly indicate errors with the commonly used dating techniques.
We've been discussing the soft tissue dating method. The soft tissue found in dino...and other fossils...clearly indicate errors with the commonly used dating techniques.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?