Okay, sounds good to me. I only know who inspired men to write the ancient Hebrew text, and it is in Him that I believe.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Okay, sounds good to me. I only know who inspired men to write the ancient Hebrew text, and it is in Him that I believe.Wow! Science can't answer all of our questions? I guess there is nothing for us to do but abandon it in favor of a magical interpretation of an ancient Hebrew text.
Not when the One who created it, tells you how He created it, and when He created it.Simple question? It is one of the most complicated questions it is possible to ask.
Not when the One who created it, tells you how He created it, and when He created it.
Then who's account do you attribute it to?Even if Genesis 1 was a literal account of history, it wouldn't come within a billion miles of being God's account of, "How I did it."
Then who's account do you attribute it to?
So, you think science can give you the answer where God(who created it) cannot?You miss the point. Saying that God gives an account of how he created life in Genesis, is like saying that British Aerospace would have given a complete account of how they manufactured Concorde by saying, "In Bristol, out of aluminium, some other materials and third party components." In fact that would be a rather fuller account than Genesis would give of the origination of life, even if it was interpreted as literal history.
So, you think science can give you the answer where God(who created it) cannot?
Were all of these volumes in the library inspired by God? I will say that it is His word in the bible that He inspired for men to write for a period of over 1500 years in three different languages, stating what He had done, and how He done it?God reveals as much as he thinks is relevant to our eternal destiny and his purposes. The rest he leaves us to figure out for ourselves. A Bible would be just one volume, amongst many thousands of others, on the shelves of a university library.
We are reexamining that it may have come out some other way than cast off rapidly spinning. If so, the spin evidence is not related. The lack of the iron core would be explained, if the iron remained with the earth. The "baking" is not proven, but is a consequence of the absence of water; so the absence of water must be explained. The sun and moon would have formed at the same distance from the sun, if they were formed together and then separated.It's an easy scientific elimination that the moon did not come from the Pacific Ocean.
The Fission Theory: This theory proposes that the Moon was once part of the Earth and somehow separated from the Earth early in the history of the solar system. The present Pacific Ocean basin is the most popular site for the part of the Earth from which the Moon came. This theory was thought possible since the Moon's composition resembles that of the Earth's mantle and a rapidly spinning Earth could have cast off the Moon from its outer layers. However, the present-day Earth-Moon system should contain "fossil evidence" of this rapid spin and it does not. Also, this hypothesis does not have a natural explanation for the extra baking the lunar material has received.
(source: NASA http://starchild.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/StarChild/questions/question38.html
I'm not sure how celestial motion applies to anything I have posted, but I think you mean me, so I will answer. There is no reason to believe that anything is revolving around anything. It is possible to model the entire universe as a stationary fractal in the fifth dimension. The math is way too complicated to get into here, but some cosmologists are looking at theories of up to ten dimensions. If correct, such a theory would mean that motion is simply created by the observer's choice. I can document at least four major theory changes in the the theory of the nature of the universe since ancient Egypt, and all have affected the Bible, or the people of God interpreting the Bible. In the NT period, the dominant theory is that things went in different directions as part of the expression of God's personality. Some applications will surprise you, for example, planetary motion, apparently retrograde, is modeled as a "wheel in a wheel", which you can see in Medieval astrolabes. It is unrelated to Ezekiel, but the commonality is fascinating.@ Ken and Rick. Then the conservation of angular momentum would beg the question, why are there planets, moons and galaxies revolving around in different directions?
And which one of those says it contributes to the age of the earth? Dude, you are completely on a different wave length. You might want to consider my updated signature from several hours ago before you posted this. Try addressing what you quote.Rick, we only get it from evolutionary scientist themselves. The following are from scientific websites:
http://mappingignorance.org/2014/01/17/open-questions-in-geoscience/
https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-biggest-unsolved-problems-in-paleontology
https://scientiaandveritas.wordpress.com/2014/01/07/paleontology-and-the-species-problem/
http://www.icr.org/article/never-ending-problems-evolutionary-biology/
http://www.evolutionnews.org/2011/07/spinning_fanciful_tales_about_048281.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unsolved_problems_in_biology
http://www.realclearscience.com/lists/unsolved_problems_in_biology/
http://www.discovery.org/a/24041
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unsolved_problems_in_chemistry
http://www.scientus.org/Wegener-Continental-Drift.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unsolved_problems_in_physics
http://www.cs.unc.edu/~plaisted/ce/dating2.html
If you need me to list more, I would be more than happy to.'
Yeah, Rick science cannot answer the simple question: How did non-living chemical compounds generate self-replicating, complex life forms?
I was going back to the big bang theory in which it states that everything was in a very small form, which began to spin. When spinning according to conservation of angular momentum, anything coming off of the spinning object would spin in the same direction(as in a clock/counter-clock wise direction). Which we do not see in the universe, there are planets spinning in opposite directions, moons of planets spinning in opposite directions of the planet they are orbiting, and galaxies spinning in opposite directions. Have a blessed day.I'm not sure how celestial motion applies to anything I have posted, but I think you mean me, so I will answer. There is no reason to believe that anything is revolving around anything. It is possible to model the entire universe as a stationary fractal in the fifth dimension. The math is way too complicated to get into here, but some cosmologists are looking at theories of up to ten dimensions. If correct, such a theory would mean that motion is simply created by the observer's choice. I can document at least four major theory changes in the the theory of the nature of the universe since ancient Egypt, and all have affected the Bible, or the people of God interpreting the Bible. In the NT period, the dominant theory is that things went in different directions as part of the expression of God's personality. Some applications will surprise you, for example, planetary motion, apparently retrograde, is modeled as a "wheel in a wheel", which you can see in Medieval astrolabes. It is unrelated to Ezekiel, but the commonality is fascinating.
From what? Be specific.@ Ken and Rick. Then the conservation of angular momentum would beg the question, why are there planets, moons and galaxies revolving around in different directions?
Yeah Rick, I am on a different wave length. I believe what the word of God says, and not what scientist say.And which one of those says it contributes to the age of the earth? Dude, you are completely on a different wave length. You might want to consider my updated signature from several hours ago before you posted this. Try addressing what you quote.
I use the evidence God provided for us in the Earth, not the writings of man of several thousand years ago that cannot be verified as God's word. We only have the word of man for that.So, you think science can give you the answer where God(who created it) cannot?
From what? Be specific.
Like I said, which one of those links has anything to do with the age of the earth other than just mentioning it? None of them are the actual science that determines the age.Yeah Rick, I am on a different wave length. I believe what the word of God says, and not what scientist say.
You might want to consider my updated signature from several hours ago before you posted this. What?
Rick, does the evidence in the earth come with a date on it?I use the evidence God provided for us in the Earth, not the writings of man of several thousand years ago that cannot be verified as God's word. We only have the word of man for that.
And how does science determine the age of the earth and universe?Like I said, which one of those links has anything to do with the age of the earth other than just mentioning it? None of them are the actual science that determines the age.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?