Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
OK, so here is my issue.. there are other so called factors, observations and evidences that some hold to be written in stone... as proof of a globe.. yet, like this one.. you say it is not something that affects snipers... While others would bet the farm, argue for days ad nausium... that it is.Coriolis is not a significant factor in shooting
It does, however, affect the rotation of large storms (i.e. hurricanes and typhoons) ...
Not one verse says its a sphere, spinning and orbiting either... Your point please?Not one verse in the Bible says that the Earth is flat ...
Wow.... so quick to judge. If I remember correctly, all I said was that I had mentioned in a thread, in the past, that the globe should give different weights at different latitudes and "someone else" said that the differences were not measurable.
You cannot just take one observation and say that you have proved something. There are other, contradictory observations, that are made over and over, that prove that we see too far....
So, as a person that has not accepted the FE myself... I am still searching.. I have not yet found proof of the FE or of a globe that is the size that they say it is..
I continue to say that something is not right...... with what we are told...
So... don't go claiming victory... you still have many other observations and so called evidences that raise questions....
Not in the talk that I heard, given by an expert... there were many variables... spin of the earth was not one of them.Guess again.
and again.
"Each rifle a sniper uses has unique characteristics that are compounded by the ammunition and many, many exterior factors. There is wind. There is humidity. There is the spin of the Earth."
Not one verse in the Bible says that the Earth is flat ...
Kinds puts the lie to this claim ...Not one verse says its a sphere, spinning and orbiting either... Your point please?
Here's the deal... The earth spins west to east.. so.. if the spin was to have any effect.. it would vary on the direction that the shot was taken... North or south would be affected the most.. east and west... not at all...
All the degrees of the compass in between these would affect the travel of the bullet in an increasing or decreasing amount.
That would be very complicated and you never hear of this...
"Every" example? I doubt that this is even remotely true.And yet, every example of these "seeing too far" videos, upon scrutiny, are shown to be...not seeing too far....worse, most of them also show missing elevation at the bottom of the target, entirely consistent with a globe, and inconsistent with a flat earth.
I imagine, then, that you should have no trouble providing a counter example."Every" example? I doubt that this is even remotely true.
Do flat earthers use critical thinking skills at all? It was an anonymous person making claims. He admitted that he does not know what type of seals were used on the ISS and then throws out some seals that won't work. Then he claims that seals would be sucked out into the vacuum and that there is no calculations possible known to design seals against a vacuum. This is all nonsense. I am an engineer and seals work on a DP not absolute pressures. If a vacuum is 0 psi and the internal pressure is 14.7 psi (atmospheric pressure) a seal can definitely work with that small of a pressure DP.
Now I know you are not serious.
This is separate from the bulge caused by the tides of the moon, but the principle is similar. While the earth's gravity pulls things toward the center of the earth, the Moon's pulls things toward the center of the moon. When the moon is directly overhead, it's gravity is exactly opposed to Earth's (but it's much smaller since the moon is less massive and further away). This leads to the water rising to meet it, but only high enough that it again reaches a balance.
When the moon is directly overhead, it's gravity is exactly opposed to Earth's (but it's much smaller since the moon is less massive and further away).
Oh, so NASA murdered Ellison Onizuka's brother Claude and replaced him with Ellison. Ordinarily, I'd be skeptical, but that website used numerology to prove everything.
These women are not identical to the Challenger crew members. In both cases, the womens' faces are too long, and their features much more spaced from top to bottom.That's right, 6 out of 7 found same full name or surname, right age group, look identical (2 identical twins!) Sure, sure. You're a coincidence theorist, tell me what are the chances of that?
Judith Reznik - Judith Reznik
Sharon ("Christa") McAuliffe - Sharon McAuliffe
Now what are the chances, what are they mate? Come on champ, come on tiger, crunch the numbers, do tell.
Your question answers itself.No, if the centrifugal force is powerful enough to make the earth bulge, where's the water going to go?
The moon, as an object of mass, always exerts a gravitational effect ... that corresponds to its mass ... and the distance between it ... and other bodies of mass.Where are you getting your data? The moon would have zero gravitational effect on the earth by the numbers. It should by rights fall to earth. Show me your calcs.
I doubt that you will accept any of these. However, they present questions that need to be answered... Is the globe huge... or is there even a curve at all...I imagine, then, that you should have no trouble providing a counter example.
These women are not identical to the Challenger crew members. In both cases, the womens' faces are too long, and their features much more spaced from top to bottom.
The centrifugal force is only powerful enough to make the oceans bulge.
The moon, as an object of mass, always exerts a gravitational effect ... that corresponds to its mass ... and the distance between it ... and other bodies of mass.
The moon is kept in orbit by the centripetal acceleration force (i.e. centrifugal force) caused by it's orbital speed around the earth.
Just like when your car goes around a curve, ... and you experience a pulling force away from the center of the curve's arc.
777 × 783
Physics for Animators
No, if the centrifugal force is powerful enough to make the earth bulge, where's the water going to go?
Where are you getting your data? The moon would have zero gravitational effect on the earth by the numbers.
It should by rights fall to earth.
Show me your calcs.
What are you jabbering about? It's obviously the same guy.
Certainly high-quality, long-life seals are required, but that vacuum pressure isn't 'stronger' than anything down here, it just means the pressure is very nearly zero. Space doesn't suck with increasing negative pressure, it has a pressure close to zero. Spacesuit and space-station seals only need to resist atmospheric pressure (760 Torr, or 1.013×10^5 Pa).His letter is read from around:
- 31:40 re seals. Flawless, maintenance-free seals required. Vacuum pressure is space is allegedly up to 1.33 × 10−11 Pa. Just a teeny bit stronger than anything down here.
De-gaussing means demagnetising - did you mean 'degassing'? You vent excess pressure by opening the valve until the pressure reduces to the required level. The fact that there's no back-pressure in space means you can do this without having to pump out the excess fluid. Any filters that are likely to need changing are placed inside the pressurised hull.Re valves from 40:00. How to de-gauss, how to vent excess pressure? No back pressure in space. how are filters changed? Compare commercial airliner. Maintenance teams?
Space systems are designed to be low-maintenance with ease of maintenance, e.g. plug-n-play swappable, with pre-planned maintenance & replacement schedules. Some spares are kept on board but can be sent up with supply missions. But things do go wrong, and astronauts may need to make spacewalks to do repairs - for example, when the ISS cooling system ammonia pump failed in 2010, the astronauts had to make over 25 hours of spacewalks to replace it. See ISS Ammonia Pump Failure.Re actuators from 44:50. Pneumatics and hydraulics unknown to deal with that temp range. Electrical require maintenance especially because no grounding, replacing components is hard work. Does Amazon deliver the spares?
Re maintenance from 50:30. Where's the machine shop? Compare ships and subs. Metal will warp, seals will leak, tubes will crack, belts will break etc etc. Do these things just fix themselves? Are the magical spinning ball faeries called up to fix everything with their magic wands? Need some heavy grinding machinery. Missions are years long.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?