Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Dealing with Creationism in Astronomy! (Moved)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RealityCheck01" data-source="post: 70854752" data-attributes="member: 317334"><p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_cosmology" target="_blank">Plasma (Alfvén-Klein) cosmology</a> was shown to be <strong>physically</strong> invalid in 1993.</p><p></p><p><strong>14 February 2017 Michael</strong>: A lie of "mainsteam "lied* about the speed of convection" <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite9" alt=":eek:" title="Eek! :eek:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":eek:" />!</p><p>Astrophysicists have used computer simulations to calculate what the convection currents should be. That is the truth.</p><p><a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.3173" target="_blank"><u>Anomalously Weak Solar Convection</u></a> (2012) measured solar convection currents and found the currents at 0.96 solar radii to be 20-100 times slower than the simulation results. That is the truth.</p><p>See <a href="https://astrobites.org/2012/10/21/convection-in-the-sun-is-slower-than-we-thought/" target="_blank">Convection in the Sun is Slower than We Thought</a></p><p></p><p><strong>14 February 2017 Michael</strong>: A lie of "personally published papers" <strong>on EU/PC theory </strong>as recently as 2005.</p><p>You contributed a fantasy about "iron mountain ranges" to a totally deluded idea that the Sun contains a neutron star. The Sun explodes and we get a fatter neutron star <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite9" alt=":eek:" title="Eek! :eek:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":eek:" />!</p><p></p><p>That better not be <strong>the</strong> EU/PC theory of solar structure or even one of the several different EU "theories' other wise it is even more deluded than I thought.</p><p></p><p>The ignorance contained in the following two published papers was exposed at ISF years ago.</p><p><a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0609509" target="_blank">The Sun is a plasma diffuser that sorts atoms by mass </a>Phys.Atom.Nucl.69:1847-1856,<strong>2006</strong></p><p><a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0512633" target="_blank">Observational confirmation of the Sun's CNO cycle</a> Journal of Fusion Energy, volume 25 (<strong>2006</strong>) pages 107-114</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RealityCheck01, post: 70854752, member: 317334"] [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_cosmology']Plasma (Alfvén-Klein) cosmology[/URL] was shown to be [B]physically[/B] invalid in 1993. [B]14 February 2017 Michael[/B]: A lie of "mainsteam "lied* about the speed of convection" :eek:! Astrophysicists have used computer simulations to calculate what the convection currents should be. That is the truth. [URL='http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.3173'][U]Anomalously Weak Solar Convection[/U][/URL] (2012) measured solar convection currents and found the currents at 0.96 solar radii to be 20-100 times slower than the simulation results. That is the truth. See [URL='https://astrobites.org/2012/10/21/convection-in-the-sun-is-slower-than-we-thought/']Convection in the Sun is Slower than We Thought[/URL] [B]14 February 2017 Michael[/B]: A lie of "personally published papers" [B]on EU/PC theory [/B]as recently as 2005. You contributed a fantasy about "iron mountain ranges" to a totally deluded idea that the Sun contains a neutron star. The Sun explodes and we get a fatter neutron star :eek:! That better not be [B]the[/B] EU/PC theory of solar structure or even one of the several different EU "theories' other wise it is even more deluded than I thought. The ignorance contained in the following two published papers was exposed at ISF years ago. [URL='https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0609509']The Sun is a plasma diffuser that sorts atoms by mass [/URL]Phys.Atom.Nucl.69:1847-1856,[B]2006[/B] [URL='https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0512633']Observational confirmation of the Sun's CNO cycle[/URL] Journal of Fusion Energy, volume 25 ([B]2006[/B]) pages 107-114 [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Dealing with Creationism in Astronomy! (Moved)
Top
Bottom