Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
De novo genes and the "no new information" argument
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="May the facts be with you" data-source="post: 75768676" data-attributes="member: 433220"><p>[QUOTE="Warden_of_the_Storm, post: 75765047, ..... But you really have to understand that this is a SCIENCE forum, and thus the main requisite is to TALK SCIENCE. When you link an article from a website that talks about using science (or misusing science in some cases) to defend the Bible, you need to be prepared for people to take you to task for it.</p></blockquote><p></p><p>The problem of course though is that "Science" is restricted to the mere collection of facts. This thread and the hundreds like it are never about the facts, but people's opinion of those facts. Just earlier today I saw two articles both of which were using the same "facts", but claimed the same set of facts proved diametrically opposite conclusions.</p><p></p><p>Richard Dawkins has said he cannot prove God does not exist, however, he remains in the view that God does not exist. Both of these statements are facts. Neither fact supports the other. both are true.</p><p>[/QUOTE]</p>
[QUOTE="May the facts be with you, post: 75768676, member: 433220"] [QUOTE="Warden_of_the_Storm, post: 75765047, ..... But you really have to understand that this is a SCIENCE forum, and thus the main requisite is to TALK SCIENCE. When you link an article from a website that talks about using science (or misusing science in some cases) to defend the Bible, you need to be prepared for people to take you to task for it. [/QUOTE] The problem of course though is that "Science" is restricted to the mere collection of facts. This thread and the hundreds like it are never about the facts, but people's opinion of those facts. Just earlier today I saw two articles both of which were using the same "facts", but claimed the same set of facts proved diametrically opposite conclusions. Richard Dawkins has said he cannot prove God does not exist, however, he remains in the view that God does not exist. Both of these statements are facts. Neither fact supports the other. both are true. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
De novo genes and the "no new information" argument
Top
Bottom