Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Day two
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mark46" data-source="post: 74469869" data-attributes="member: 257078"><p>Yup, even if it hurts Democratic chances in the general election.</p><p></p><p>I like the legal analogy. If the DA didn't think that he could win a case with the jury, then he wouldn't indict. Democrats in the House are ignoring this simple principle. The principle is NOT whether the prosecution thinks the defendant is guilty. </p><p></p><p>How "bad" is this going for Trump? I believe that Trump people and Republicans are considering whether to slow play the proceedings in the House (to the degree that they can) and in the Senate. After all, in the Senate, the situation is a TRIAL. The number of defense witnesses are not likely to be limited, at least not until there are dozens over months. Also, the cross-examination of prosecution witnesses could be extensive. Finally, there is no particular need to meet more than 2-3 times a week.</p><p></p><p>At first, McConnell was considering trying to get this over as soon as possible, certainly by the end of January. Now, it seems that this won't necessarily happen.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mark46, post: 74469869, member: 257078"] Yup, even if it hurts Democratic chances in the general election. I like the legal analogy. If the DA didn't think that he could win a case with the jury, then he wouldn't indict. Democrats in the House are ignoring this simple principle. The principle is NOT whether the prosecution thinks the defendant is guilty. How "bad" is this going for Trump? I believe that Trump people and Republicans are considering whether to slow play the proceedings in the House (to the degree that they can) and in the Senate. After all, in the Senate, the situation is a TRIAL. The number of defense witnesses are not likely to be limited, at least not until there are dozens over months. Also, the cross-examination of prosecution witnesses could be extensive. Finally, there is no particular need to meet more than 2-3 times a week. At first, McConnell was considering trying to get this over as soon as possible, certainly by the end of January. Now, it seems that this won't necessarily happen. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Day two
Top
Bottom