Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
David Daleiden Doubles Down
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PapaZoom" data-source="post: 69230996" data-attributes="member: 342011"><p>The question of human personhood is a philosophical one and not scientific. The "when" will vary from idea to idea and there is no way to fully test the truth of the proposition. Any good jurist can make the Constitution say just about anything with enough legalistic mumbo-jumbo. It's an argument that is necessary because the full humanity of the unborn from conception to birth is not in question scientifically. And by full humanity I am referring to the fact that at the moment of conception, a new and unique human being comes into existence. This is a scientific fact. Personhood is a philosophical speculation. No one knows for sure when this personhood actualizes. It's like suggesting that one day the human being is not a person and the next day they are. One day you can kill him/her, the next day you can't.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PapaZoom, post: 69230996, member: 342011"] The question of human personhood is a philosophical one and not scientific. The "when" will vary from idea to idea and there is no way to fully test the truth of the proposition. Any good jurist can make the Constitution say just about anything with enough legalistic mumbo-jumbo. It's an argument that is necessary because the full humanity of the unborn from conception to birth is not in question scientifically. And by full humanity I am referring to the fact that at the moment of conception, a new and unique human being comes into existence. This is a scientific fact. Personhood is a philosophical speculation. No one knows for sure when this personhood actualizes. It's like suggesting that one day the human being is not a person and the next day they are. One day you can kill him/her, the next day you can't. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
David Daleiden Doubles Down
Top
Bottom