Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Darwinism: Science or philosophy?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Christian Soldier" data-source="post: 323055" data-attributes="member: 3759"><p><span style="color: red">The quote below proves that Hitler would cover up his bitter anti-Christianity when talking to people outside his Inner Circle and the upper echelons of the Nazi party.</span></p><p></p><p><strong>"Amid his political associates in Berlin, Hitler made harsh pronouncements against the church, but in the presence of the women he adopted a milder tone--one of the instances where he adapted his remarks to his surroundings."</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Albert Speer, <em>Inside The Third Reich</em></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>---------------------------------------------------</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: red">Hitler in italics:</span></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>"Hitler had been much impressed by a scrap of history he had learned from a delegation of distinguished Arabs. When the Mohammedans attempted to penetrate beyond France into Central Europe during the eighth century, his visitors had told him, they had been driven back at the battle of Tours. Had the Arabs won this battle, the world would be Mohammedan today. For theirs was a religion that believed in spreading the faith by the sword and subjugating all nations to that faith. The Germanic peoples would have become heirs to that religion. Such a creed was perfectly suited to the Germanic temperament. Hitler said that the conqueroring Arabs, because of their racial inferiority, would in the long run have been unable to contend with the harsher climate and conditions of the country. They could not have have kept down the more vigorous natives, so that ultimately not Arabs but Islamized Germans could have stood at the head of this Mohammedan Empire.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Hitler usually concluded this historical speculation by remarking: "<em>You see, it's been our misfortune to have the wrong religion. Why didn't we have the religion of the Japanese, who regard sacrifice for the Fatherland as the highest good? The Mohammedan religion too would have been much more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?</em>""</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Albert Speer, <em>Inside The Third Reich</em></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>---------------------------------------------------</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>"The Fuhrer is deeply religious, though completely anti-Christian. He views Christianity as a symptom of decay. Rightly so. It is a branch of the Jewish race. This can be seen in the similarity of religious rites. Both have no point of contact to the animal element, and thus, in the end they will be destroyed."</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>"His arguments cannot be refuted on any serious basis. They are totally unanswerable. He has little regard for homo sapiens. Man should not feel so superior to animals. He has no reason to."</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Joseph Goebbels, <em>Goebbel's Personal Diary</em></strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Christian Soldier, post: 323055, member: 3759"] [color=red]The quote below proves that Hitler would cover up his bitter anti-Christianity when talking to people outside his Inner Circle and the upper echelons of the Nazi party.[/color] [b]"Amid his political associates in Berlin, Hitler made harsh pronouncements against the church, but in the presence of the women he adopted a milder tone--one of the instances where he adapted his remarks to his surroundings." Albert Speer, [i]Inside The Third Reich[/i] --------------------------------------------------- [color=red]Hitler in italics:[/color] "Hitler had been much impressed by a scrap of history he had learned from a delegation of distinguished Arabs. When the Mohammedans attempted to penetrate beyond France into Central Europe during the eighth century, his visitors had told him, they had been driven back at the battle of Tours. Had the Arabs won this battle, the world would be Mohammedan today. For theirs was a religion that believed in spreading the faith by the sword and subjugating all nations to that faith. The Germanic peoples would have become heirs to that religion. Such a creed was perfectly suited to the Germanic temperament. Hitler said that the conqueroring Arabs, because of their racial inferiority, would in the long run have been unable to contend with the harsher climate and conditions of the country. They could not have have kept down the more vigorous natives, so that ultimately not Arabs but Islamized Germans could have stood at the head of this Mohammedan Empire. Hitler usually concluded this historical speculation by remarking: "[i]You see, it's been our misfortune to have the wrong religion. Why didn't we have the religion of the Japanese, who regard sacrifice for the Fatherland as the highest good? The Mohammedan religion too would have been much more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?[/i]"" Albert Speer, [i]Inside The Third Reich[/i] --------------------------------------------------- "The Fuhrer is deeply religious, though completely anti-Christian. He views Christianity as a symptom of decay. Rightly so. It is a branch of the Jewish race. This can be seen in the similarity of religious rites. Both have no point of contact to the animal element, and thus, in the end they will be destroyed." "His arguments cannot be refuted on any serious basis. They are totally unanswerable. He has little regard for homo sapiens. Man should not feel so superior to animals. He has no reason to." Joseph Goebbels, [i]Goebbel's Personal Diary[/i][/b] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Darwinism: Science or philosophy?
Top
Bottom