Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Darwinian Sects, Lies and Evolutionists
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RufusAtticus" data-source="post: 264310" data-attributes="member: 2592"><p>You don't happen to have any evidence for that do you? From Hitler's own <em>Mein Kampf</em>: "Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, <strong>I am fighting for the work of the Lord</strong>." That doesn't quite mess with your assertion that Nazi racism was based on Darwinism.</p><p></p><p>You can read more of Hitler's religious views <a href="http://www.freethought-web.org/ctrl/quotes_hitler.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Again, you wouldn't happen to have any evidence for this? In fact, history records that the communist party rejected Darwinism because it was too capitalistic and western and instead insured that Russian science follow Lysenkoism. You can read more about this failure of russian science <a href="http://www.comms.dcu.ie/sheehanh/lysenko.htm" target="_blank">here</a>. I am curious how you can claim that communists based their philosophy on something they rejected.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Evidence please. You wouldn't happen to be able to explain what "Natural Law" is? I know of no scientific concept that goes by that name.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's a nice assertion. You wouldn't happen to have any evidence to support it?</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>That's a pretty big claim to make. You wouldn't in fact be able to show that the data was invented? Unless you can, you are bearing false witness, and we all know how bad of a thing that is.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Again, you wouldn't happen to have any evidence that the evidence is fabricated? You're starting to sound a lot like Jonny Cochran.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Please enlighten us then. Exactly how many would be needed. Don't forget about the plants, insects, bacteria, viruses, and all the other forms of life.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So? What does that have to do with whether the fossils so far uncovered show evolution and the relationships between taxa?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Until you explain what "Natural Law" is and how it relates to evolution, you cannot support this claim. You do realize that the accuracy of science cannot be determined by whatever emotional, philsophical, political, or religious conclusions that one might draw from it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well scientists like me say otherwise, with evidence to support it. Until you can do more than simply assert this, your comments hold no weight.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Okay. You wouldn't be able to actually provide some examples of "evolution fundamentalists" that use such arguments; would you? I suspect that they share something in common with the tooth fairy: they don't exist.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RufusAtticus, post: 264310, member: 2592"] You don't happen to have any evidence for that do you? From Hitler's own [i]Mein Kampf[/i]: "Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, [b]I am fighting for the work of the Lord[/b]." That doesn't quite mess with your assertion that Nazi racism was based on Darwinism. You can read more of Hitler's religious views [url=http://www.freethought-web.org/ctrl/quotes_hitler.html]here[/url]. Again, you wouldn't happen to have any evidence for this? In fact, history records that the communist party rejected Darwinism because it was too capitalistic and western and instead insured that Russian science follow Lysenkoism. You can read more about this failure of russian science [url=http://www.comms.dcu.ie/sheehanh/lysenko.htm]here[/url]. I am curious how you can claim that communists based their philosophy on something they rejected. Evidence please. You wouldn't happen to be able to explain what "Natural Law" is? I know of no scientific concept that goes by that name. That's a nice assertion. You wouldn't happen to have any evidence to support it? That's a pretty big claim to make. You wouldn't in fact be able to show that the data was invented? Unless you can, you are bearing false witness, and we all know how bad of a thing that is. Again, you wouldn't happen to have any evidence that the evidence is fabricated? You're starting to sound a lot like Jonny Cochran. Please enlighten us then. Exactly how many would be needed. Don't forget about the plants, insects, bacteria, viruses, and all the other forms of life. So? What does that have to do with whether the fossils so far uncovered show evolution and the relationships between taxa? Until you explain what "Natural Law" is and how it relates to evolution, you cannot support this claim. You do realize that the accuracy of science cannot be determined by whatever emotional, philsophical, political, or religious conclusions that one might draw from it. Well scientists like me say otherwise, with evidence to support it. Until you can do more than simply assert this, your comments hold no weight. Okay. You wouldn't be able to actually provide some examples of "evolution fundamentalists" that use such arguments; would you? I suspect that they share something in common with the tooth fairy: they don't exist. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Darwinian Sects, Lies and Evolutionists
Top
Bottom