Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That's nice, I'm not a Biblical Creationist but I not going to argue against it. God can do anything He wants and anyway he wants. He may have used evolution (I just don't see the solid proof for that). In the end He gets all the glory.In the end it doesn't really matter how uncertain the conclusions of evolutionary biologists are. Biblical creationism has been off the table as a scientific proposition for two hundred years. That particular "black swan" showed up a long time ago.
That's nice, I'm not a Biblical Creationist but I not going to argue against it. God can do anything He wants and anyway he wants. He may have used evolution (I just don't see the solid proof for that). In the end He gets all the glory.
Listening to all of the replies here and looking up info myself still doesn't make me feel evolution is correct. I just don't see it.Yes, humans are fallible and prone to all sorts of errors. Yes, nothing in science is 100% accurate.
But that does not mean that we should discard anything science says just because we don't like it. To do so is just a gross example of arrogance and ignorance from whoever says we should.
Listening to all of the replies here and looking up info myself still doesn't make me feel evolution is correct. I just don't see it.
What I see is actually evolutionists claiming the theory of evolution is the life formed on Earth and the Hand of God had nothing to do with bring life about. Evolutionists have put together this package without 100% proof that this is how it happened. No research team was there to see the mutations take place and evolve. Evolutionists rely on the bones that they dug up in the ground, a very incomplete collection (hence the ghost species).I have no issues with the Sabine’s video as it is an illustration of human behaviour rather than any science. She claims of being unfairly treated in her field of physics, has an axe to grind and uses YouTube videos to vent her spleen.
Your posts also illustrate human behaviour in action, you see evolution as threat to your faith resulting in an us vs them argument (scientist vs the common man).
Instead of showing why evolution is wrong and creationism is right, the “why should we trust scientists?” argument is nothing more than a strawman because it’s a lot easier question their credibility instead of making the case for creationism.
What I see is actually evolutionists claiming the theory of evolution is the life formed on Earth and the Hand of God had nothing to do with bring life about.
Evolutionists have put together this package without 100% proof that this is how it happened.
No research team was there to see the mutations take place and evolve.
Evolutionists rely on the bones that they dug up in the ground, a very incomplete collection (hence the ghost species).
There are scientists who disagree with the theory of evolution and they are ridiculed and laughed at by their colleagues. It's like being in a secret society, members keep their mouths shut about the inner workings. But I do understand like you said, Sabine does have her own ax to grind so I listen and weigh each thing she says.
Biblical creationism has been off the table as a scientific proposition for two hundred years.
Then why do people arc & spark when someone says science can take a hike?
If Biblical creationism and science are like water and oil, then where's the beef?
I'll be honest with you, nothing can convince me. I am a practicing Catholic and not even the easing up from the Catholic Church on evolution has altered my views. Like some of the stuff that astronomers and astrophysicists make predictions on about objects millions of light years away, evolutionists making these predictions (I know this is not the right word to use but I am having a mental block) about things that happened hundreds of millions of years ago I feel is really ridiculous and unnecessary. I'm fascinated with the past but I wouldn't have made a job out of it (but then again, "enquiring want to know"). When you are talking about such large distances, you can really only give a somewhat educated guess (but nothing that I would bet any money on and absolutely nothing I would use to shape policies in our society).What would count as hard evidence for you? Not proof, but evidence that shows that theory of evolution is a sound, factual scientific theory?
I'll be honest with you, nothing can convince me. I am a practicing Catholic and not even the easing up from the Catholic Church on evolution has altered my views. Like some of the stuff that astronomers and astrophysicists make predictions on about objects millions of light years away, evolutionists making these predictions (I know this is not the right word to use but I am having a mental block) about things that happened hundreds of millions of years ago I feel is really ridiculous and unnecessary.
Zabina (spelled faux-a-net-ih-kah-lee) herself is no longer trustworthy. I regret that I must write that, but write it I must.
I'm sure you'll all have alot to complain about from what Sabine has said but I just want the audience to know about our "trustworthy" scientists too (for the record). Not all they write is 100% accurate.
Her personal experiences and received "unfairness" (I judge it not) is no excuse for her to make broad claims against all of science. She is fortifying the formidable forces aligned against science, knowledge, facts, etc. and she knows what she is doing. With regards to her videos, on actual science I ignore them now, and her politics video I operate in "Flamethrower first, ask questions second" mode.I have no issues with the Sabine’s video as it is an illustration of human behaviour rather than any science. She claims of being unfairly treated in her field of physics, has an axe to grind and uses YouTube videos to vent her spleen.
Full agree.Your posts also illustrate human behaviour in action, you see evolution as threat to your faith resulting in an us vs them argument (scientist vs the common man).
Instead of showing why evolution is wrong and creationism is right, the “why should we trust scientists?” argument is nothing more than a strawman because it’s a lot easier question their credibility instead of making the case for creationism.
It wasn't the choice of video, it was the form of the provided link. I did not view the video because there was no way I was clicking on a tracker-embedded search link. I tried to strip it clean to view the video, but could not.Sorry, I took the first video that look decent. I'll check for another.
Her personal experiences and received "unfairness" (I judge it not) is no excuse for her to make broad claims against all of science. She is fortifying the formidable forces aligned against science, knowledge, facts, etc. and she knows what she is doing. With regards to her videos, on actual science I ignore them now, and her politics video I operate in "Flamethrower first, ask questions second" mode.
Sure. Darwin's theory:Like all you guys say to me - prove it.
There is no Holy Spirit of science. ( if the reference puzzles you, look it up in the Bible) Because there is no holy scripture of science, all criticism is allowed.Sounds to me like someone committed the unpardonable sin against science.
There was more than one list posted here. But you should know that even many YECs have finally admitted the fact of speciation. Some even go as far as new genera and families.Could you rattle off a few of them and who observed them?
There is no Holy Spirit of science.
No, that's false, too. I took my first graduate course in immunology from a professor who was a YEC. And this was at a large public university. He was a tenured professor. You were lied to about that.There are scientists who disagree with the theory of evolution and they are ridiculed and laughed at by their colleagues.
A minor Greek goddess. Has nothing whatever to do with the way science works.Then who is Urania?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?