Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Dark Matter
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Michael" data-source="post: 65070396" data-attributes="member: 627"><p>Besides those three straight failures in the lab, *and* all those botched mass estimates related to *normal* baryonic matter? </p><p></p><p>Birkeland knew and understood more about *solar* physics, *and* more about the basic physics of plasma that most astronomers do to this day! He created a *working model* of his theory, and with it he *successfully predicted* the existence of both types of high speed charged particles in solar wind, polar jets, electrical discharges in the solar atmosphere, coronal loops, cathode rays, and pretty much everything we observe today in modern solar satellite images of the sun.</p><p></p><p>To this day, the mainstream knows so very *little* about actual plasma physics, that the *entire crew* over at JREF didn't have the knowledge to correct the most *basic* of fundamental physics errors in your math hero's presentation over a period of *months*! That's how bad it actually is!</p><p></p><p>Considering the fact that 99+ percent of the known universe is in the plasma state, and virtually every gram of mass found since 2006 has been in the plasma state, it's *pitiful* that astronomers do not even understand basic circuit theory, and basic MHD theory. Holy cow! When an *amateur* spends more time actually *reading* and *studying* the relevant material than the *pros*, there is a *serious* problem!</p><p></p><p>Sorry, Birkeland made more successful predictions about solar physics and the basic workings of plasma than anyone else until Alfven. To this day your mainstream knows almost *nothing* about circuit theory, and how it applies to plasma. They dabble in what Alfven himself called "pseudoscience" and made obsolete with his double layer paper!</p><p></p><p>Your whole mainstream can't even correctly identify the first feature of plasma that Birkeland himself wrote about and explained, now called a "Birkeland current". Instead, they point at the sky and childishly say "Hey look, a "space slinky!" <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite5" alt=":confused:" title="Confused :confused:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":confused:" /> <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/old/doh.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":doh:" title="doh :doh:" data-shortname=":doh:" /></p><p></p><p>Please, after those three straight strikes in the lab with the *only* part of Lambda-CDM theory that even *can* be tested in the lab, you have no right to lecture anyone about their "legendary failures"!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Michael, post: 65070396, member: 627"] Besides those three straight failures in the lab, *and* all those botched mass estimates related to *normal* baryonic matter? Birkeland knew and understood more about *solar* physics, *and* more about the basic physics of plasma that most astronomers do to this day! He created a *working model* of his theory, and with it he *successfully predicted* the existence of both types of high speed charged particles in solar wind, polar jets, electrical discharges in the solar atmosphere, coronal loops, cathode rays, and pretty much everything we observe today in modern solar satellite images of the sun. To this day, the mainstream knows so very *little* about actual plasma physics, that the *entire crew* over at JREF didn't have the knowledge to correct the most *basic* of fundamental physics errors in your math hero's presentation over a period of *months*! That's how bad it actually is! Considering the fact that 99+ percent of the known universe is in the plasma state, and virtually every gram of mass found since 2006 has been in the plasma state, it's *pitiful* that astronomers do not even understand basic circuit theory, and basic MHD theory. Holy cow! When an *amateur* spends more time actually *reading* and *studying* the relevant material than the *pros*, there is a *serious* problem! Sorry, Birkeland made more successful predictions about solar physics and the basic workings of plasma than anyone else until Alfven. To this day your mainstream knows almost *nothing* about circuit theory, and how it applies to plasma. They dabble in what Alfven himself called "pseudoscience" and made obsolete with his double layer paper! Your whole mainstream can't even correctly identify the first feature of plasma that Birkeland himself wrote about and explained, now called a "Birkeland current". Instead, they point at the sky and childishly say "Hey look, a "space slinky!" :confused: :doh: Please, after those three straight strikes in the lab with the *only* part of Lambda-CDM theory that even *can* be tested in the lab, you have no right to lecture anyone about their "legendary failures"! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Dark Matter
Top
Bottom