Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Dark Matter
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Michael" data-source="post: 65059867" data-attributes="member: 627"><p>There's absolutely nothing "magic" about gravity, distance, momentum, and MHD theory, but plasma *absolutely can* do exactly that, and probably *must* do exactly that during a galaxy collision.</p><p></p><p>The stars within the *stellar infrastructures* of *both* galaxies are separated by vast distances. Furthermore they have a *lot* of mass and momentum due to their mass concentration. During a so called 'collision' between galaxies, the huge distances between stars will mean that most of the stars will pass right through the other galaxy, without much chance of a direct hit. The momentum of the black holes, and the stars in the galaxies will cause them to pretty much "fail to interact" in terms of any massive immediate collisions.</p><p></p><p>On the other hand, those massive million degree plasma filaments and thin plasmas bodies *will* slam into each other, and they *will* begin to electrically interact, causing all sorts of x-ray and high energy processes to ensue. </p><p></p><p>The *magic* as you describe it is directly related to *momentum* and *distance*. It's not really magic of course, it's just physics. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>I've handed you all sorts of peer reviewed work, including Peratt's galaxy mass layout papers. Your side is the one citing unpublished websites and handwaving at non peer reviewed material. I see you haven't given up on your ad hom crutch yet either. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite3" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":(" /></p><p></p><p>Show me they weren't! The term you're using "dark matter" is simply a *placeholder term for human ignorance*, nothing more. We already know that 99+ percent of the known universe is in the plasma state, so the odds are certainly in my favor. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>You've had three straight failures of exotic matter theory in the just the last 18 months!</p><p></p><p>Worse yet however, is look what's occurred since that 2006 study in terms of what we discovered about your now falsified galaxy mass estimation techniques. We learned since that 2006 study that:</p><p></p><p>A) Galaxies are *twice as bright* as we first imagined, meaning they are *more massive* than we imagined.</p><p>B) We discovered in 2009 that you also have been *grossly* (by a factor of four) underestimating the number of *entire stars* in a galaxy, again *underestimating* the mass of the galaxies.</p><p>C) In 2012, we discovered more mass in the form of million degree plasma around the galaxy than is contained in all the rest of the mass of the stars *put together*!</p><p></p><p>We now even *know why* and *how* you botched the mass estimates, and we now have 20/20 hindsight in terms of all those failures at LHC, at LUX and in the electron roundness experiments. </p><p></p><p>Denial isn't just a river in Egypt as you put it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Michael, post: 65059867, member: 627"] There's absolutely nothing "magic" about gravity, distance, momentum, and MHD theory, but plasma *absolutely can* do exactly that, and probably *must* do exactly that during a galaxy collision. The stars within the *stellar infrastructures* of *both* galaxies are separated by vast distances. Furthermore they have a *lot* of mass and momentum due to their mass concentration. During a so called 'collision' between galaxies, the huge distances between stars will mean that most of the stars will pass right through the other galaxy, without much chance of a direct hit. The momentum of the black holes, and the stars in the galaxies will cause them to pretty much "fail to interact" in terms of any massive immediate collisions. On the other hand, those massive million degree plasma filaments and thin plasmas bodies *will* slam into each other, and they *will* begin to electrically interact, causing all sorts of x-ray and high energy processes to ensue. The *magic* as you describe it is directly related to *momentum* and *distance*. It's not really magic of course, it's just physics. :) I've handed you all sorts of peer reviewed work, including Peratt's galaxy mass layout papers. Your side is the one citing unpublished websites and handwaving at non peer reviewed material. I see you haven't given up on your ad hom crutch yet either. :( Show me they weren't! The term you're using "dark matter" is simply a *placeholder term for human ignorance*, nothing more. We already know that 99+ percent of the known universe is in the plasma state, so the odds are certainly in my favor. :) You've had three straight failures of exotic matter theory in the just the last 18 months! Worse yet however, is look what's occurred since that 2006 study in terms of what we discovered about your now falsified galaxy mass estimation techniques. We learned since that 2006 study that: A) Galaxies are *twice as bright* as we first imagined, meaning they are *more massive* than we imagined. B) We discovered in 2009 that you also have been *grossly* (by a factor of four) underestimating the number of *entire stars* in a galaxy, again *underestimating* the mass of the galaxies. C) In 2012, we discovered more mass in the form of million degree plasma around the galaxy than is contained in all the rest of the mass of the stars *put together*! We now even *know why* and *how* you botched the mass estimates, and we now have 20/20 hindsight in terms of all those failures at LHC, at LUX and in the electron roundness experiments. Denial isn't just a river in Egypt as you put it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Dark Matter
Top
Bottom