Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Did Daniel stand in his lot in 70AD ?
Daniel 12:13 But go thou thy way till the end be: for thou shalt rest, and stand in thy lot at the end of the days.
Try to put your presumptions aside and let Scripture tell the story.Did Daniel stand in his lot in 70AD ?
The end of days in this present age we are currently living in.Out of curiousity, but not to get in a debate about this in this thread, in the event I disagree, when do you take the end of the days meant here to be meaning? The end of the days in this present age we are currently living in? Or in the end of the days following a future millennium?
Daniel 12:13 is talking about Daniel being resurrected in the rapture/resurrection event to take place at the time of the end. The events of Daniel 11:36-12:13 are yet to come.Try to put your presumptions aside and let Scripture tell the story.
Daniel's time was about 700 years before 70 AD....so Daniel wasn't alive in 70 AD. Daniel was a prophet.
Gabriel, though, God's messenger returned to speak with Mary and John the baptizer's father in order to give them details of the "last days" that were coming (for them). That's in Luke 1.
The accurate phrase is "days of the end".The end of days in this present age we are currently living in.
That may be your story that's been Frankensteined from a select few passages.Daniel 12:13 is talking about Daniel being resurrected in the rapture/resurrection event to take place at the time of the end. The events of Daniel 11:36-12:13 are yet to come.
No Frakensteining of verses. The rapture/resurrection has not happened yet.That may be your story that's been Frankensteined from a select few passages.
But that's NOT God's story being told all throughout Scripture.
Umm....no resurrection has happened yet?The rapture/resurrection has not happened yet
What about the end of days, at the Cross? Many want the Cross to be a fulfillment, but not many want a resurrection of all the OT at the Cross.Out of curiousity, but not to get in a debate about this in this thread, in the event I disagree, when do you take the end of the days meant here to be meaning? The end of the days in this present age we are currently living in? Or in the end of the days following a future millennium?
There's no such thing (not the way futurists link the two and describe it).I wrote the rapture/resurrection.
Daniel lived from 620-538 BC. 538 + 70 is 608 years. Daniel's 70 weeks started in 538. Cyrus ruled in Babylon from 539-530 BC. The first year of Cyrus was the last year of Daniel's life. All 490 years would have fit up to the first century of BC. There was about a 10 year gap between the first 7 set of weeks and the last 62 set of weeks. Why would any one not think that Daniel knew the 70 weeks had started before Daniel died?Try to put your presumptions aside and let Scripture tell the story.
Daniel's time was about 700 years before 70 AD....so Daniel wasn't alive in 70 AD. Daniel was a prophet.
Gabriel, though, God's messenger returned to speak with Mary and John the baptizer's father in order to give them details of the "last days" that were coming (for them). That's in Luke 1.
You need to be more specific.There's no such thing (not the way futurists link the two and describe it).
Jesus has already resurrected. He's not going to do an encore performance for those who missed (or deny) the first one.
Listen again. Wright specifically states it's not about a decension....but, instead, Jesus being raised in power and glory.as Jesus is descending down to earth.
You switched to a different video. My comments pertained to the other video you posted.Listen again. Wright specifically states it's not about a decension....but, instead, Jesus being raised in power and glory.
They're both N.T. Wright speaking on the same topic (holding to the same beliefs in both). I just thought the second video may be more clearly explained.You switched to a different video. My comments pertained to the other video you posted.
Jesus quoted Daniel's prophecy (recorded in the New Testament) and many people use what Jesus said to be in reference to His "second coming" only because "coming" is in the statement. Wright is making the point that most of the passages used to refer to a "second coming" are in reference to Jesus's glorification and/or vindication.He makes the point of Jesus as the one like the Son of Man arriving in heaven - as not being the Second Coming. Well, duh? I don't know of anyone who says those verses in Daniel 7 are about the Second Coming.
Thank you for your kindness. I'm trodding along in recovering. Thank you.Separately, I hope your stroke recovery is going well.
But I don't think anyone uses those passages in Daniel 7 as being about Jesus's Second Coming.Jesus quoted Daniel's prophecy (recorded in the New Testament) and many people use what Jesus said to be in reference to His "second coming" only because "coming" is in the statement. Wright is making the point that most of the passages used to refer to a "second coming" are in reference to Jesus's glorification and/or vindication.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?