• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Daniel, was he a eunuch?

bbbbbbb

Well-Known Member
Jun 9, 2015
30,054
13,938
73
✟413,910.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Castration of subordinated men was generally preferred over killing. Typically after a major battle, as we see in the OT it was not at all unusual for the conquering army to exterminate all of the men and sometimes the women and children, except young virgins.

This practice is true to the present time as seen in South Sudan. The Ottoman Empire was highly regulated in assigning its subjects to particular roles. Very early they learned that eunuchs were very useful subjects and that staffing their army with Muslims tended to diminish the Muslim male population, so they filled the ranks of the army with captured eunuchs. In time, however, the army rebelled and warred against the Muslim captors and frequently established their own independent domain, as in Egypt.

Back to Daniel, it would have been perfectly acceptable practice for the Babylonians to spare young men and boys to serve them, with the condition being that they could not interbreed with Babylonian women.
 
Upvote 0