Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Dad on Youtube
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dad" data-source="post: 65407528" data-attributes="member: 98011"><p>Are you here suggesting that the word of God is a 'poor filter'???</p><p></p><p></p><p> Sane, sane sane. Take that!</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The differences listed, for example <span style="font-size: 15px"><a href="http://splitmerge.webs.com/split.pdf" target="_blank">here</a></span> form a strong biblical case. Science does not know either way, and can prove no case for any state of the past. Your comment on the concept is off target.</p><p></p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y45g_jmXkA8" target="_blank">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y45g_jmXkA8</a></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p> You want to suggest the bible is wrong now? The plot thickens. So it was not really that you felt I did not have a bible case, your problem seems to lie with the bible itself.</p><p></p><p> I am pointing out that He was not a liar after all, as so called science tries to paint Him. There really was a creation of the world and man and a flood, etc. If you want to claim God looks bad for being real and true and the creator, you are on weak ground indeed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dad, post: 65407528, member: 98011"] Are you here suggesting that the word of God is a 'poor filter'??? Sane, sane sane. Take that! The differences listed, for example [SIZE=4][URL="http://splitmerge.webs.com/split.pdf"]here[/URL][/SIZE] form a strong biblical case. Science does not know either way, and can prove no case for any state of the past. Your comment on the concept is off target. [url]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y45g_jmXkA8[/url] You want to suggest the bible is wrong now? The plot thickens. So it was not really that you felt I did not have a bible case, your problem seems to lie with the bible itself. I am pointing out that He was not a liar after all, as so called science tries to paint Him. There really was a creation of the world and man and a flood, etc. If you want to claim God looks bad for being real and true and the creator, you are on weak ground indeed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Dad on Youtube
Top
Bottom