Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Well, that's where it gets interesting you see, as it was the professional creationists who equated creationism with ID.Okay, thanks.
I'll check into it.
Intelligent Design is a joke; and if the Dover judge(s) equated it with Creation ... well ... as I said ... spiritual wickedness in high places.
I like your way of thinking!In the same vein, there's no empirical evidence or proof of the Resurrection, but the subsequent behavior of the Apostles, the exponential growth of Christianity, and the estimated two billion followers of a poor carpenter turned itinerant preacher all provide compelling evidence.
Evidently it got shut out of the courtroom.What ever happened to faith....
It's never been in the courtroom, actually. The US is a secular government with secular courts.Evidently it got shut out of the courtroom.
In the same vein, there's no empirical evidence or proof of the Resurrection, but the subsequent behavior of the Apostles, the exponential growth of Christianity, and the estimated two billion followers of a poor carpenter turned itinerant preacher all provide compelling evidence.
"Professional" -- that says it all.Well, that's where it gets interesting you see, as it was the professional creationists who equated creationism with ID.
Oh, I understand that.
I just happen to believe that, while there can't be empirical evidence or proof of creation, there is still compelling evidence of it, some of which I listed in my previous post.
In the same vein, there's no empirical evidence or proof of the Resurrection, but the subsequent behavior of the Apostles, the exponential growth of Christianity, and the estimated two billion followers of a poor carpenter turned itinerant preacher all provide compelling evidence.
If that's true -- and I don't think it is* -- but if that's true, God help us.It's never been in the courtroom, actually. The US is a secular government with secular courts.
Well, if professionals had built the "Ark," it would have actually existed.
If that's true -- and I don't think it is* -- but if that's true, God help us.
Don't you know diabolical mimicry when you see it?Technically professionals have built an Ark: Life-size Noah’s Ark
You call that 'fair'?To be fair, we really don't know what the "subsequent behavior of the Apostles" actually was,
Only it doesn't work that way.And you can use the same argument to provide 'compelling evidence' for Islam and every other major religion.
That's just it. We don't need to prove it in court.Evidently it got shut out of the courtroom.
Until the first elephant stepped aboard it, then it would have fallen apart like a popsicle stick house.Well, if professionals had built the "Ark," it would have actually existed.
Here's the thing about arguments: you can't just make stuff confirming every religion, or many others, and go "Oh well I'm a monotheist!" because that isn't how they work. Arguments have implications.Only it doesn't work that way.
We're monotheists, and every other Heinz 57 religion can take a hike.
Only it doesn't work that way.
We're monotheists, and every other Heinz 57 religion can take a hike.
We're monotheists, and every other Heinz 57 religion can take a hike.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?