Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I simply do not have the faith to believe in evolution, whereas creation itself testifies of God's existence
You want to know what's ironic, MoonLancer?
While you guys were frothing at the mouth at us because we couldn't come up with a working definition of KIND --- Pluto reared up and caught you guys off-guard without a definition of PLANET.
And you had to sacrifice that whole planet to save face.
I think what he is saying that creationism as hypothesis isn't testable. Can you show anything that's testable or falsifiable about it? Their have been many opportunities to show evolution wrong, and at every step the fundamentals of evolution have been proven right.
I agree. Evolution doesn't say anything about god. I think its up to people to reconcile that themselves. I do think its wrong to teach something without evidence or to exclude something because one doesn't like the evidence and its obvious conclusions.
Really creationists should be more upset with abiogenesis
I simply do not have the faith to believe in evolution, whereas creation itself testifies of God's existence
Sorry, but The Creation itself makes creationism look foolish. It was by studying The Creation that we came to understand where the human species really came from, and how old the earth is. It was only by believing in a book written by men that some came to have faith in creationism instead.
There have been things in Science that have been taught without evidence, do you feel that way then?
Sorry, but The Creation itself makes creationism look foolish. It was by studying The Creation that we came to understand where the human species really came from, and how old the earth is. It was only by believing in a book written by men that some came to have faith in creationism instead.
I don't agree with anything being taught without evidence. Which things are you speaking about?
I don't agree with anything being taught without evidence. Which things are you speaking about?
Abiogenesis for one. It was taught for a long time without out one piece of evidence to support it.
AV1611VET said:SETi Picture
I simply do not have the faith to believe in evolution, whereas creation itself testifies of God's existence
Man, you're WAY BEHIND here, my friend. I've already shown from the Scriptures where the earth was referred to as round, and I have already shown how the earth indeed can have four corners, as well as how they can be located --- several times.Against proving the earth was round, and not having 4 corners?
I don't need to search anywhere --- I've already shown from the Scriptures that this universe is teeming with life from one end to the other, and every star in-between. You're Drake Equation is WAY BEHIND the Bible.Sometimes you just have to search, and you will come up (or not come up) with the evidence.
I already believe in evolution, hot shot, but thanks for the advice, anyway.So instead of dissecting the Evolution theory, get off your high horse and do some research yourselves.
Good --- then count me insane.The complete lack of understanding, and just getting by with quoting scripture is insane.
We're waiting on S.E.T.I. to finish first.I'm still looking forward to the creationist argument in scientific journals
Man, you're WAY BEHIND here, my friend. I've already shown from the Scriptures where the earth was referred to as round, and I have already shown how the earth indeed can have four corners, as well as how they can be located --- several times.
You need to catch up here, sir.I don't need to search anywhere --- I've already shown from the Scriptures that this universe is teeming with life from one end to the other, and every star in-between. You're Drake Equation is WAY BEHIND the Bible.I already believe in evolution, hot shot, but thanks for the advice, anyway.Good --- then count me insane.We're waiting on S.E.T.I. to finish first.
What's the "theory behind radio telescopes"? I wasn't aware they were built on "theory" --- principle, maybe --- not "theory".Are you implying there is something wrong with the theory behind radio telescopes?
What's the "theory behind radio telescopes"? I wasn't aware they were built on "theory" --- principle, maybe --- not "theory".
evolution fails at the start unless you can accept that something can appear from nothing as an act of nothing with influence from no one.
What was taught before that? God did it. Then came a better explanation, and theory. The difference is that science was trying to prove it and (GET OFF THEIR [wash my mouth][wash my mouth][wash my mouth][wash my mouth]) to prove things.
And what did God create this universe from
That is a very short sighted and somewhat typical response. Many of our scientists in the past were believers. God did it never stopped them from discovering or trying to find out how "things" worked.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?