Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Of course not --- [rolls eyes].Except it's neither complete nor coherent.
Of course not --- [rolls eyes].
Neither is Genesis 1, right?
I expect that the ONLY things you guys understand is the concept: GOD DID IT.
I expect that the ONLY things you guys understand is the concept: GOD DID IT.
Genesis 1. (Highlights)
1:1 God created
1:2 And the Spirit of God moved
1:3 And God said
1:4And God saw
1:5And God called
1:6And God said,
1:7And God made
1:8And God called
1:9And God said
1:10And God called
1:11And God said,
1:12And the earth brought forth grass
(oops, one slipped through where something else did something!)
1:14And God said
1:15And God made
1:16And God set
1:17And God said
1:21And God created
1:22 And God blessed
1:24 And God said
1:25 And God made
1:26 And God said
1:27 So God created
1:29 And God said
Well, yes there is, but as I said, you wouldn't understand.Is there significantly more to it than that?
Well, yes there is, but as I said, you wouldn't understand.
(And I'm speaking from experience.)
Four come to mind:Maybe you should just tell me again. If it's something I've heard before from you but disagree with, I hope you'll understand that there is a real difference between people who disagree with you and people who don't understand what you are saying.
So, please, do tell us what else there is.
Christianity reduced to emo teenager commentary? Say it aint so.Well, yes there is, but as I said, you wouldn't understand.
(And I'm speaking from experience.)
And you still don't understand it --- as the Bible says you won't.Christianity reduced to emo teenager commentary? Say it aint so.
How do you verify that your interpretation is correct? What observations are available in the KJV to help narrow your interpretation as being the single correct interpretation?Four come to mind:
- historical-grammatical interpretation
- creatio ex nihilo
- embedded age
And you still don't understand it --- as the Bible says you won't.
Yeah I'm afraid I don't speak /wrist goth dialect.And you still don't understand it --- as the Bible says you won't.
No --- I'm saying GOD DID IT is the only thing you guys do understand --- thus I would not have included it on my list.(that last one is "God did it", in case you missed it).
No --- sorry --- I'll probably remember after this thread has been mothballed.So, is it pre-destination?
I don't think we're misunderstanding these things in the least. Rather we disagree with them. And for good reasons as well.Embedded Age, creatio ex nihilo, dispensation theology, fundamentalism, independent fundamentalism, King James Version Only, sola Scriptura, sanctification (initial, progressive, or entire), the definition of "moral", miracles vs. magic, etc. and so on --- forget it.
Thanks SE, but I don't need you to prove my point for me --- the Bible can do it just fine ---Yeah I'm afraid I don't speak /wrist goth dialect.
All that thou art ignorant about teh universe cuz you don't know the super secret Christian handshack stuff is a cop out.
I think you are --- and the Bible backs me --- therefore: case closed.I don't think we're misunderstanding these things in the least.
---1 Corinthians 2:14 said:But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.
I could make a point here --- but I'll refrain.Rather we disagree with them. And for good reasons as well.
Suffice it to say, if you really understood, your icon would be different.
Completely invalid reasoning. The discussion here is about the reliability of the Bible. Specifically the reliability of the creation account within the Bible. To attempt to use the Bible to claim that the Bible is reliable is equivalent to merely repeating yourself that the Bible is reliable.I think you are --- and the Bible backs me --- therefore: case closed.
That's very condescending of you. I could say the exact same thing of your faith icon.Suffice it to say, if you really understood, your icon would be different.
I'm mainly talking about the ones with theNeglecting all those with a "different" faith icon who also aren't wild about all the entries on that list.
I'm mainly talking about the ones with theicon.
Notice the verse I quoted though says, "the natural man", which would include many others.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?