Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Aman is big on claims, not so much with the evidence to support the same.
If we inherited DNA from Adam, then we should also have Adam's pre-integration sites, but we don't. Therefore, the claim is falsified.
That must be your mantra. I have answered this several times but you don't like my answer because it totally DESTROYS the Lie of Evolution which Falsely teaches that Humans magically evolved from the common ancestor of Apes, who did NOT evolve from the water until Billions of years AFTER the common ancestor of ALL Humans (Adam) was made.
you haven't noticed, I have stopped answering your misunderstanding on other boards. It seems to do NO good to tell anyone who worships Evolutionism the Truth because they have eyes which cannot see. God Bless you
Have you noticed that NO ONE has been able to refute my empirical (testable) historic evidence which confirms Scripture by showing that the FIRST Humans arrived SUDDENLY on Planet Earth some 10-12k years ago?
Now, it's your time to show us that History is Wrong. I don't think you can since the evidence is clear and cannot be changed, like the False Theory of Evolution can and has been several times.
Amen?
Have you noticed that NO ONE has been able to refute my empirical (testable) historic evidence which confirms Scripture by showing that the FIRST Humans arrived SUDDENLY on Planet Earth some 10-12k years ago?
Now, it's your time to show us that History is Wrong. I don't think you can since the evidence is clear and cannot be changed, like the False Theory of Evolution can and has been several times. Amen?
1. Except that modern humans evolved about 200,000 years ago.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anatomically_modern_human
2. Quotes from the Bible aren't scientific evidence.
No one on this site has been refuted more than you aman. Congrats.
1. IF we were modern Humans 200k years ago, the WHY did we wait for 190k years before we planted the first crop?
Humans (descendants of Adam) ate plants and Adam farmed with NO evolution, but the sons of God (prehistoric people) ate meat they could catch to take home to the Cave. You are confused because you THINK prehistoric people were Humans (descendants of Adam). This is False since Adam was made from the dust and prehistoric people evolved from the common ancestor of Apes.
2. The evidence is in the Scientific Facts, some of which are just now being discovered, which are listed in Genesis. NO man of the time could have possibly known that it was Millions of years AFTER the Big Bang before the first Stars lit up, since was only recently discovered by Space Telescopes.
Genesis correct shows that it was on the 3rd Day when the beginning of our Cosmos occurred. Gen 2:4...AND...Gen 1:16 correctly shows that the first Stars of our Cosmos did NOT light up until the 4th Day. Woops, did God reveal Himself with His superior knowledge in Genesis? Amen. Want more?
What evidence would you expect to find if it was super-natural?You have never demonstrated that it was a super-natural event.
Santa Clause has been demonstrated to be false. The virgin birth and the resurrection has not.So is Santa Claus delivering presents to every child in a single night.
That depends. Is it Jesus making the proclamation?Do you really think that the simple proclamation that something is supernatural makes all of the evidence go away?
That depends. Is Jesus the defense attorney?If you were on a jury, would you be convinced to find the defendant not guilty if the defense attorney said the crime was a supernatural event, so the evidence should just be ignored?
Re-creation with modification is an explanation when we take both the ERV observation and biblical history into account.That's a dogmatic belief, not an explanation.
The simple answer is that the dumb prehistoric humans were hunter gatherers before they went extinct, and the developments in social structures, tool technology, domestication of plants and animals began with the creation of Adam and his descendants a few thousand years ago.Humans were hunter-gatherers before then. Developments in social structures, tool technology, domestication of plants and animals and possibly changes in climate led humans to start to settle in areas rather than roam around, though the exact reasons for this are not completely clear, though it's a fascinating area of study.
There is another argument that makes a much stronger case, IMHO. The creationist story goes that after the "Fall", mutations built up in the ERV's which transformed them into retrovirus producing factories. Evolution describes quite a different scenario. Evolution proposes that ERV's were as close to be infectious at the time of their insertion, and have only become less infectious since.
That actually makes for a testable prediction. If we were to create a consensus sequence of recent HERV-K insertions, what does each predict? Creationism predicts that a consensus sequence, which removes accumulated mutations, should not produce infectious viral particles. Evolution predicts that a consensus sequence can produce infectious particles since it is closest to being the original viral sequence.
According to Harvard University biological anthropologist Richard Wrangham: Our hominid ancestors could never have eaten enough raw food to support our large, calorie-hungry brains. The secret to our evolution, he says, is cooking. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/cooking-up-bigger-brains/You don't accept God's evidence but prefer instead man's changeable views. The problem is that Science has NO idea HOW or WHEN we magically changed from prehistoric to Human intelligence. When I present empirical historic evidence which you cannot explain, you simply claim it doesn't mean anything and then violate the 9th Commandment by saying i haven't presented any. Amen?
The theory is that the Godly descendants of Adam intermarried with the ungodly heathen or what the Hebrews called gentiles. Genesis 6:1-4."the sons of God came in to the daughters of man and they bore children to them." This was the reason for the flood.If we inherited DNA from Adam, then we should also have Adam's pre-integration sites, but we don't. Therefore, the claim is falsified.
What evidence would you expect to find if it was super-natural?
Santa Clause has been demonstrated to be false.
The virgin birth and the resurrection has not.
Evidence doesn't prove anything one way or the other if it's a super-natural event.
It's not my fault that you choose to ignore the history.
1. IF we were modern Humans 200k years ago, the WHY did we wait for 190k years before we planted the first crop?
Humans (descendants of Adam) ate plants and Adam farmed with NO evolution, but the sons of God (prehistoric people) ate meat they could catch to take home to the Cave. You are confused because you THINK prehistoric people were Humans (descendants of Adam). This is False since Adam was made from the dust and prehistoric people evolved from the common ancestor of Apes.
2. The evidence is in the Scientific Facts, some of which are just now being discovered, which are listed in Genesis. NO man of the time could have possibly known that it was Millions of years AFTER the Big Bang before the first Stars lit up, since was only recently discovered by Space Telescopes.
It shouldn't produce an actual virus, but if this creationist argument were correct, it would still produce something that's much more similar to an actual virus than modern-day ERVs are.
The reason is that if modern-day ERVs are descended from the same endogenous elements that gave rise to modern-day viruses, that comment ancestor would presumably have had a form that's intermediate between its two descendants. It's the same reason why the common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees is more chimpanzee-like than modern humans.
It sounds like the details of the situation are still different from what this creationist argument would predict, but you might want to be a little be more specific about how the consensus sequence differs from what we'd expect to find in a common ancestor of viruses and ERVs.
Your problem is that you are relying on natural observations to explain a super-natural event.
What are the chances of a man being born to a virgin and rising from the dead?
It is only evidence-free for to those who have never experienced the supernatural or are simply ignorant of it.Exactly. The supernatural is entirely evidence-free! Surely that's the entire point?
By showing that fat old men cannot climb chimneys with a bag full of toys over their shoulder.No. Using the same construct that you would use for your God, it is 'not possible to prove a negative'. Please show how you would prove that Santa is false.
The claims are based on the eyewitness testimonies of those who observed the virgin birth and the resurrection, and by those of us who experience the supernatural effects of God in our daily lives.And again,mint is not possible to prove a negative.
Yes, you can make any fanciful claim, describe it as "supernatural" and it will be impossible to either prove or disprove. Well done.
Equating biblical history with The Iliad demonstrates your ignorance of biblical history.You would equate something akin to The Iliad as "history"!?
It is zero based purely on the observation of natural processes. It is the observation of purely natural processes that leads to your delusion of supernatural processes. You are deluding yourself by restricting yourself to purely natural observations.Zero?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?