Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Today at 12:12 AM chickenman said this in Post #15
until some function is found for the broken urate oxidase pseudogene, then creationism doesn't deserve consideration
Today at 10:56 AM Follower of Christ said this in Post #25
Over the long haul, mutation could very well affect thier size, shape, color, etc., again.
I fail to see how Gods design for adaptability or even mutation would prove evolution, though.
They will adapt to thier environment if possible, but they remain rabbits.
Today at 06:26 AM wblastyn said this in Post #32
Just curious, why do creationists ignore all the evidence found in creation. Paul told us we could learn about God's nature from creation, why don't you trust him?
I believe God creatyed everything, yes, but I believe He used evolution, the Big Bang, etc to do it.Correct me if I am wrong here, but you are FOR creation (albeit a long one) and Chickenman seems to be definetly against creation altogether.
Bats with eyes isn't intelligent, humans with tails (in their genome) isn't intelligent, snakes with pelvises isn't intelligent, etc.BTW, DO YOU even understand the implications of Intelligent Design.
Yes, we believe that you are a false prophet/teacher, or have been mislead by false prophets/teachers, and are teaching the heresy of creationism, and denying what the Master planted in creation, bringing swift destruction on yourselves and anyone else who believes you have to accept creationism to be a Christian.2Pe 2:1 ''But false prophets were also among the people, as also false teachers will be among you, who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, and denying the Master who has bought them, bringing swift destruction on themselves. ''
Actually it's not against Genesis since it was never intended to be taken literally in the first place. Augustine would agree as would many theologians today. So if any one is preaching heresy it would be you. Then, as of now, seeing that your ''teaching'' is heresy against the very inspired word of our Lord and Gods account of His creation, I would have to label YOU as a heretic and deceiver.
And also a fool who thinks that he can add to our Lords word against Gods direct commandment and then escape his own destruction.
From http://www.asa3.org/ASA/resources/CMBergman.htmlGeorge McCready Price, a Seventh-Day Adventist science teacher who received a BA from Loma Linda College in 1912, for many years taught college level Latin, Greek, chemistry and physics. He wrote about 25 books that were published from 1902 to 1955, and most of them have sold very well (Morris, 1984, p. 80).He was probably one of the foremost expounders of the dual ideas that all life had been created only 6,000 to 10,000 years ago, and that the flood was responsible for much of the fossil and geological record. He believed, both early and again later in his career, that the so-called young earth position is a peripheral issue:
The question of how much time was occupied in the work of Creation is of no importance, neither is the question of how long ago it took place. The one essential idea is that in its nature Creation is essentially inscrutable; we can never hope to know just how it was accomplished; we cannot expect to know the process or the details, for we have nothing with which to measure it. The one essential thing in the doctrine of Creation is that the origin of our world and of the things upon it came about at some period of time in the past by a direct and unusual manifestation of Divine power; and that since this original Creation other and different forces and powers have prevailed to sustain and perpetuate the forms of life and indeed the entire world as then called into existence (Price, 1917, p. 8).
Do you have an intelligent reason for humans having the information in their tails in their genomes, plus genes suppressing the tail gene, bats and various other blind creatures with eyes, snakes with pelvises but no use for it since they have no legs, etc. The only intelligent reason I can see is evolution.FOC:
This is a heretical as it gets.
Regardless of your supposed ''christianity'' you are denying creation altogether in this statement.
I wish for my Brethren to see the TRUE nature of the Evolution Theory in this remark.
Heresy is false teaching, creationism has been proven false by science, yet people continue to teach it as true, what would you call it?FOC:
''HERESY OF CREATIONISM''
And now we all see the REAL agenda of the Evolutionist Idealism.
Well why is there all this evidence for the earth being ancient and evolution, God created everything (doesn't matter how), so He put the evidence there. God does not lie.FOC:
''PLANTED IN CREATION''
Very nice interpretation.
It should be obvious to all your true intentions here.
So now you're assuming the position of God? He alone can judge whether someone is Christian or not. We can tell if people are Christian by their fruits, accepting evolution has nothing to do with "fruits". I have seen no reason to assume he is not ChristianFOC:
I have far too many times allowed myself to be drawn in by assuming people were Christians.
I can say I am president Bush, but that dont make it so.
Yes, the creation story has been there, it was interpreted literally at first because they had nothing else to go on, just like they assumed the earth was flat and at the centre of the solar system from scripture, until science proved them wrong, then they accepted a non-literal interpretation, just like they did with verses implying an flat earth and geocentricism.FOC:
Where do you people get this stuff at?
The creation story was in the bible LOOOONG before all your ''cults'' came about.
Or what you think is His exact word.And I have no need to ''run'', I have the EXACT word of God to rely on.
Unless of course it was never intended to be interpreted literally in the first place, in which case you are re-interpreting it. And guess what, I dont have to RE-INTERPRET it to get it to mean what I want it to say.
Did Dennis Mckinsey send you in here or did you come on your own?
I agree, I was just pointing out that if God zapped everything into existance then there should be no mistakes and intelligent design fails because the design has errors.the existence of mistakes in creation doesn't refute christianity
a christian can simply accept that god set the process of evolution in motion to produce life
Yesterday at 06:32 PM Follower of Christ said this in Post #43
Here is the answer to your so called mistakes in creation.
See if you can figure it out.
"For we know that all the creation groans together and travails together until now. "
(Romans 8:22 LITV)
And you're right, GOD is the judge of who is a christian and who is not.
"Nevertheless the foundation of God standeth sure, having this seal, The Lord knoweth them that are his....
(2 Timothy 2:19 KJV)
HE knows his followers and He knows Heretics who teach deceit.
''Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but try the spirits to see if they are of God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world. ''
(1 John 4:1 MKJV)
''Beware of false prophets who come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. You shall know them by their fruits....''(Matthew 7:15-16 MKJV)
''But there were also false prophets among the people, even as there will be false teachers among you, who secretly will bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing on themselves swift destruction. And many will follow their pernicious ways, and because of them the way of truth will be evil spoken of. ''
(2 Peter 2:1-2 MKJV)
''O Timothy, guard the Deposit, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of falsely-named science, which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with you. Amen. ''
(1 Timothy 6:20-21 MKJV)
Except these things are actually part of the design of the creature, it can't be explained by sin entering the world. Either God created creatures with these flaws or they are a product of evolution. I don't believe God makes errors, so I'd have to go with evolution.Here is the answer to your so called mistakes in creation.
See if you can figure it out.
"For we know that all the creation groans together and travails together until now. "
(Romans 8:22 LITV)
Except you don't just reject evoluton, which is the foundation of modern biology, you also reject geology and cosmology.I dont have to accept every ''theory'' that science tries to present on order to accept science.
Evolution is the ''foundation'' of nothing.
Evolution is one of the fundamental underlying concepts of modern science. This powerful theory explains such phenomena as the history of life preserved in the fossil record; the genetic, molecular, and physical similarities and differences among organisms; and the geographic distribution of organisms today and in the past. Indeed, evolution forms the foundation of modern biology and paleontology and is well documented by evidence from a variety of scientific disciplines.
So in other words you'll never accept it because any evidence we show you is obviously put there to deceive us.This type of ''blinding'' is very typical of Gods behavior in dealing with disobedience.
I am not trying to convince all that evolution is a lie.
I am trying to show my true brethren that they should tread very carefully over this issue
Today at 07:10 AM Follower of Christ said this in Post #46
Lewis:
You're presenting an old athiest word game.
I dont have to accept every ''theory'' that science tries to present on order to accept science.
Just as athiests can accept parts of the bible as historical fact, they dont accept the parts that conflict with thier ''faiths'' (evolution).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?