Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Creationism: Young Earth vs Old Earth
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Micaiah" data-source="post: 554863" data-attributes="member: 6011"><p>G'day JohnR7,</p><p>I refer to your previous post on the first page where you write:</p><p> </p><p></p><p>This theory is inconsistent with a number of aspects of what the Scriptures teach.</p><p></p><p>1. Death did not come about until after the 'fall' when sin entered into the world.</p><p></p><p>2. The context of the first chapter indicates that the various days of creation were a literal 24 hour period. Each desciption of the days event concludes with 'the evening and the morning were the __ day". The plain interpretation of this is to conclude the writer was refering to one day. You say these time periods could be millions of years.</p><p></p><p>3. In verse 26, God states man is made in His image. This man was equal to the man stated in chapter 2. They were the same man.</p><p></p><p>4. Why would God say Adam was lonely if there were numerous other 'men' created in God's image who inhabited the world when Adam was created.</p><p></p><p>I view your theory an attempt to marry the theory of athiests (evolution) to the teaching of Scripture. There have been a number of frauds and fakes as people have sought to find the missing link between ape and man. Why seek to accomodate such a speculative theory?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Micaiah, post: 554863, member: 6011"] G'day JohnR7, I refer to your previous post on the first page where you write: This theory is inconsistent with a number of aspects of what the Scriptures teach. 1. Death did not come about until after the 'fall' when sin entered into the world. 2. The context of the first chapter indicates that the various days of creation were a literal 24 hour period. Each desciption of the days event concludes with 'the evening and the morning were the __ day". The plain interpretation of this is to conclude the writer was refering to one day. You say these time periods could be millions of years. 3. In verse 26, God states man is made in His image. This man was equal to the man stated in chapter 2. They were the same man. 4. Why would God say Adam was lonely if there were numerous other 'men' created in God's image who inhabited the world when Adam was created. I view your theory an attempt to marry the theory of athiests (evolution) to the teaching of Scripture. There have been a number of frauds and fakes as people have sought to find the missing link between ape and man. Why seek to accomodate such a speculative theory? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Creationism: Young Earth vs Old Earth
Top
Bottom