Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Creationism vs God...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Arikay" data-source="post: 688871" data-attributes="member: 6561"><p>I think you missed the original point. The original point was wether creationism went against gods creation and thus, god. </p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>First Natural Selection - Natural Selection then and there ignores the laws of genetics. Only can two organisms of the same species result in a mixed or combined offspring. For example: Two dogs; labrador and poodle = Labradoodle or even Cats.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p></p><p>Um, natural selection or survival of the fittest (I believe there is a difference but i cant remember why) doesnt ignore the laws of genetic. First of all, I didnt know genetics had laws. Second, survival of the fittest says that an organism that is most addapted to its environment will continue on. Slowly breeding out weakness. It really has nothing to do with mixing species.</p><p>What you may be miss understanding is that a group evolves into a different species. Not a single life form. So the group would evolve, and there would be plenty of mates within that group.</p><p></p><p><strong>Rock Strata - To create a fossil immense pressure is required and an amazingly concealed position and dirt can result in a successful fossil. If organisms were to simply die and lie on dirt beds or on the sea floor; scavengers or bacteria would corrode the organism before it had time to form into a fossil. So therefor a universal flood would explain fossils much more logically as opposed to Evolutionists view to things. Therefor grasping a point for God as opposed to Creationism (Noah's Ark). The flood has also been a great asset to various religions, also stating that other religions broke off from Christianity long ago. Thus creating validity of events occurring in the past that are portrayed in the Bible and so forth. </strong></p><p></p><p>Someone with more knowledge about this will have to tackle it. My question is, how come different fossils are found in Different rock strata? How come there is no solid evidence found to support a global flood?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Arikay, post: 688871, member: 6561"] I think you missed the original point. The original point was wether creationism went against gods creation and thus, god. [b]First Natural Selection - Natural Selection then and there ignores the laws of genetics. Only can two organisms of the same species result in a mixed or combined offspring. For example: Two dogs; labrador and poodle = Labradoodle or even Cats. [/b] Um, natural selection or survival of the fittest (I believe there is a difference but i cant remember why) doesnt ignore the laws of genetic. First of all, I didnt know genetics had laws. Second, survival of the fittest says that an organism that is most addapted to its environment will continue on. Slowly breeding out weakness. It really has nothing to do with mixing species. What you may be miss understanding is that a group evolves into a different species. Not a single life form. So the group would evolve, and there would be plenty of mates within that group. [b]Rock Strata - To create a fossil immense pressure is required and an amazingly concealed position and dirt can result in a successful fossil. If organisms were to simply die and lie on dirt beds or on the sea floor; scavengers or bacteria would corrode the organism before it had time to form into a fossil. So therefor a universal flood would explain fossils much more logically as opposed to Evolutionists view to things. Therefor grasping a point for God as opposed to Creationism (Noah's Ark). The flood has also been a great asset to various religions, also stating that other religions broke off from Christianity long ago. Thus creating validity of events occurring in the past that are portrayed in the Bible and so forth. [/b] Someone with more knowledge about this will have to tackle it. My question is, how come different fossils are found in Different rock strata? How come there is no solid evidence found to support a global flood? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Creationism vs God...
Top
Bottom