Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Creationism/Creation Science... approved by Arkansas house
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BobRyan" data-source="post: 75930919" data-attributes="member: 235244"><p>My statement was not "they saw the number of generations it took for dust and rocks to produce all life" -- rather I am taking one specific example "humans" and looking at how long it took "to get humans" from their previous ancestor to humans. Not "rocks"</p><p></p><p>so then taking that same number of observed generations at 40 years per generation would be about 5M to 11M years ago. Now ask yourself - what were humans supposedly doing 11M years ago? Answer -- there were no humans at all 11 M years ago even by evolution's terms/story-telling</p><p></p><p></p><p>I am looking for the one-celled life form prokaryote to make that one step jump from prokaryote with no nucleus - to a one-celled animal Eukaryote with a nucleus in a number of generations that it supposedly would take for our non-human ancestors to come up with humans.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>More specifically how many generations since our most recent non-human ancestor to humans? or even from two ancestor levels below that -- to human?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BobRyan, post: 75930919, member: 235244"] My statement was not "they saw the number of generations it took for dust and rocks to produce all life" -- rather I am taking one specific example "humans" and looking at how long it took "to get humans" from their previous ancestor to humans. Not "rocks" so then taking that same number of observed generations at 40 years per generation would be about 5M to 11M years ago. Now ask yourself - what were humans supposedly doing 11M years ago? Answer -- there were no humans at all 11 M years ago even by evolution's terms/story-telling I am looking for the one-celled life form prokaryote to make that one step jump from prokaryote with no nucleus - to a one-celled animal Eukaryote with a nucleus in a number of generations that it supposedly would take for our non-human ancestors to come up with humans. More specifically how many generations since our most recent non-human ancestor to humans? or even from two ancestor levels below that -- to human? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Creationism/Creation Science... approved by Arkansas house
Top
Bottom