In a post from last year, someone described Real Science as:
"Science is not taking one of these wild ideas that suits you personally and then going to to purposely try to find evidence for it. Science is finding evidence before you even know its evidence and then making ideas based on that."
The poster was using this to bash evolution, but it really effectively does away with Creation Science altogether.
Creation Science starts with the presumption of a series of facts (young earth, no evolution, global flood, etc) and then purposefully goes out to find evidence which supports these ideas, and purposefully goes out to find evidence *against* what they don't believe. What's more is they fully ADMIT that this is what they are doing! Right in the ICR creed, as well as over at AIG, they say that they start with these certain truths and go forward from there to establish "scientifically" that they must be true and the opposite must be false.
They definitely do NOT start with the evidence and "make ideas based on that".
So, an anti-evolutionist just defined Creation Science as *not* being True Science.
"Science is not taking one of these wild ideas that suits you personally and then going to to purposely try to find evidence for it. Science is finding evidence before you even know its evidence and then making ideas based on that."
The poster was using this to bash evolution, but it really effectively does away with Creation Science altogether.
Creation Science starts with the presumption of a series of facts (young earth, no evolution, global flood, etc) and then purposefully goes out to find evidence which supports these ideas, and purposefully goes out to find evidence *against* what they don't believe. What's more is they fully ADMIT that this is what they are doing! Right in the ICR creed, as well as over at AIG, they say that they start with these certain truths and go forward from there to establish "scientifically" that they must be true and the opposite must be false.
They definitely do NOT start with the evidence and "make ideas based on that".
So, an anti-evolutionist just defined Creation Science as *not* being True Science.