Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Creation predictions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="redleghunter" data-source="post: 72346016" data-attributes="member: 348895"><p>I said no such thing. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Show the non European and near east source. The near east was dominated by Byzantine Eastern Orthodoxy before the Muslim dynasties and the West dominated by Catholic Christian monarchies. </p><p></p><p></p><p>We know this from roughly 6 manuscripts dating back to 1000 AD almost one thousand years after the events. And again an internal triumvirate struggle for power is still Roman and not an independent source.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Show the various independent sources which are not Roman and the manuscript history. </p><p></p><p>Remember I'm not the one calling ancient history into question. I'm just applying the flawed and biased standards you and others apply to the NT historical manuscript evidence. Which amounts to impeaching the main witness in a crime.</p><p></p><p>I have also pointed out that your line of argument as well as others is from the position "prophecies don't happen therefore the authors of Scriptures wrote contemporary of the events or thereafter. Which is <em>vaticinia ex eventu.</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="redleghunter, post: 72346016, member: 348895"] I said no such thing. Show the non European and near east source. The near east was dominated by Byzantine Eastern Orthodoxy before the Muslim dynasties and the West dominated by Catholic Christian monarchies. We know this from roughly 6 manuscripts dating back to 1000 AD almost one thousand years after the events. And again an internal triumvirate struggle for power is still Roman and not an independent source. Show the various independent sources which are not Roman and the manuscript history. Remember I'm not the one calling ancient history into question. I'm just applying the flawed and biased standards you and others apply to the NT historical manuscript evidence. Which amounts to impeaching the main witness in a crime. I have also pointed out that your line of argument as well as others is from the position "prophecies don't happen therefore the authors of Scriptures wrote contemporary of the events or thereafter. Which is [I]vaticinia ex eventu.[/I] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Creation predictions
Top
Bottom