J
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Some people seem to view their faith as though it were a house of cards.I am currently a general monotheist but am looking back into Christianity and decided to ask a friend about it. I also did some church shopping.
Well I found creation to be a hot topic lately for some reason.
I can talk to my six day creationist believing buddy about Genesis and he can see easily see how I can read Genesis as allegory and agree to disagree because the "creation how" is really a minor point compared to what Jesus did. But when I brought this up at his churches Bible study hour I was berated as supporting atheism???? All I did was mention how I think science finds the how and the religion tells the why....is that so odd of a concept?
Welcome to the wonderful, wide, wacky world of Christianity. We may be sinners; but we keep God in stitches.
A substantial number of us take Genesis literally. Others, like you, allegorically. Many do, and many do not, see evolutionary processes as conflicting with Scripture. Those of us who are prepared to entertain or accept evolution obviously would disagree that God is "not necessary" to it.
I am one of those who think your how/why approach is very good. I respect the right of your friend's church to disagree; but doubt it is the place for you. I'd hang on to the friend but keep shopping. Church members and pastors are usually quite forthcoming about what they believe and how. Also, all of us attune to different worship styles: contemporary, traditional, liturgical/nonliturgical, creedal/noncreedal, etc, etc and at least seemingly ad. inf.
If you are really unfamiliar with Christianity, I'd suggest you get a copy of C. S. Lewis's Mere Christianity. You'll likely find it at B&N or Borders; and Amazon should have it in a wide range of prices and covers. Lewis taught at both Oxford and Cambridge but, as the book is based on radio talks and talks to servicemen in WWII, the book is pretty readable.
Some people seem to view their faith as though it were a house of cards.
Not to contradict the previous poster, but a newer alternative would be Tom Wright's Simply Christian which is produced in the same spirit as Mere Christianity, but for the 21st century where the former is very much of the 20th.
There are a great many Christians who do not believe the early chapters of Genesis to be a literal account.
A lot of people get hung up on this, but it really isn't an essential point of Christianity.
The important thing is how you relate to Jesus. You say you are already a monotheist, so Christ is the difference between your beliefs and Christianity. Can I suggest that rather than Genesis, you study the gospels, look at the man, Jesus, and the claims He made.
Because really, knowing Him and loving Him are what matters.. disagreeing on the details doesn't matter so much.
You know what is odd... I can deal with the Jesus rising from the dead part its the part/whole of God/Trinity/savior part that is hard to understand for me.
HiYou know what is odd... I can deal with the Jesus rising from the dead part its the part/whole of God/Trinity/savior part that is hard to understand for me.
Hi
As Criada said, the Trinity isn't something any of us can claim to understand logistically... but, I guess I sort of see it in the way water can come in 3 states: water, ice and vapour. They're precisely the same thing, but they exist in different forms.
It doesn't even begin to explain the complexity (and abject unknowability) but it makes the Trinity seem a little less incomprehensible.
You're a Christian seeker who's yet a Calvinist?Hmm... And a liberal Calvinist at that. Okay...
Definitely. But I think there's enough stuff that's, I guess, verifiable to make those leaps of faith valid.O.k. I guess we have to get into leap of faith territory sometimes.
because the "creation how" is really a minor point compared to what Jesus did.
It's not a minor how. If creation didn't literally happen as outlined in Genesis, then the death of Jesus was not necessary.
Not sure what you mean by this since your profile says Theistic evolution. What do you mean by creation?
At the heart of it, it's about the way relationship is at the very heart of God. The one who calls himself "I am who I am" exists as three persons in perfect relationship. And creates a creation to exist in relationship. It recognises that relationships is the most important thing there is.You know what is odd... I can deal with the Jesus rising from the dead part its the part/whole of God/Trinity/savior part that is hard to understand for me.
It doesn't matter what my profile says. The most important question is will you make a decision for Jesus Christ right now? That's all that matters. All this questioning and wishy-washiness is wasting time. The Lord is coming back soon. The world is about to collapse. What's your decision?
At the heart of it, it's about the way relationship is at the very heart of God. The one who calls himself "I am who I am" exists as three persons in perfect relationship. And creates a creation to exist in relationship. It recognises that relationships is the most important thing there is.
And remember that the bible never talks in terms of Trinity. That's an abstraction deduced from the bible. Rather than worrying about that abstraction, get to grips with texts like John's gospel and Paul's letters to Philippi and Collosae. Let those, and the relationships they describe in narrative and poetry seep in.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?