Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Could the Republican party oust Trump?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="stevil" data-source="post: 75134817" data-attributes="member: 277368"><p>Trump definately got elected and is now the USA president, yes, noone has ever disputed that.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Noone has ever disputed this.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You said in your post that I responded to</p><p></p><p>Which wasn't actually correct. Trump did win the election, there is no disputing that.</p><p>But "the people" mostly voted for Hilary. Which would mean "the people" decided that Hilary should be president.</p><p></p><p>But, the way the election system works is that it is the "electorates" that decide who the president should be. The electorates rather than the people.</p><p>I pointed this subtlety out in my response to you, just correct the record and make sure we were aligned with facts.</p><p></p><p></p><p>If you had simply said Trump won the election then I wouldn't have had a problem with your post.</p><p>But saying "the people decided they wanted Trump" is not actually or factually true.</p><p></p><p>But then the funny thing is, you accused my response as being MSM talking points, which I pointed out as "facts", which you then responded with</p><p></p><p>Which is a very weird response, because we both know that I stated the facts.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="stevil, post: 75134817, member: 277368"] Trump definately got elected and is now the USA president, yes, noone has ever disputed that. Noone has ever disputed this. You said in your post that I responded to Which wasn't actually correct. Trump did win the election, there is no disputing that. But "the people" mostly voted for Hilary. Which would mean "the people" decided that Hilary should be president. But, the way the election system works is that it is the "electorates" that decide who the president should be. The electorates rather than the people. I pointed this subtlety out in my response to you, just correct the record and make sure we were aligned with facts. If you had simply said Trump won the election then I wouldn't have had a problem with your post. But saying "the people decided they wanted Trump" is not actually or factually true. But then the funny thing is, you accused my response as being MSM talking points, which I pointed out as "facts", which you then responded with Which is a very weird response, because we both know that I stated the facts. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Could the Republican party oust Trump?
Top
Bottom